Supreme Court Nominee

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

ABA only grades members of the guild.

Now you’re grasping.

Have there been any nominees that haven’t been ABA members?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Trump didn’t select on race. He didn’t commit to race. Yaboi did.

Making decisions based on race is cringe. CRT is cringe.

Race is just another identity… just like sex or religion.

Making decisions based on sex is? Cringe?

WHAT! Look at what you just posted to defend that old, white racist.

Yes, based on sex is also cringe.

What did I say that was incorrect? Race, sex, religion all identities. All identities used to narrow a pool of potential SC judges over our entire history.

[WuWei]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

ABA only grades members of the guild.

Now you’re grasping.

Have there been any nominees that haven’t been ABA members?

Recently no. And the members of the Federalist Society who grade and recommend are as well.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

What did I say that was incorrect? Race, sex, religion all identities. All identities used to narrow a pool of potential SC judges over our entire history.

Selecting based on identity is cringe. Are “progressive” and “conservatives” also “identities”?

How about selection on merit? How would that be?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

@WuWei

The ABA does the exact same thing. I will grant the transparency of the guild.

They also accredit law schools. Can you even pass the bar and practice law without a degree from such a school?

Meanwhile, the Federalist Society is a think tank.

Yes.

Sure, of former insiders and current members of the guild.

Well then, the accrediting board of a profession, and a conservative think tank critical of that profession are hardly the same thing vis a vis recommending and grading nominees.

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

ABA only grades members of the guild.

Now you’re grasping.

Have there been any nominees that haven’t been ABA members?

Recently no. And the members of the Federalist Society who grade and recommend are as well.

Cool. So it is a distraction.

Do you see the vast differences between the ABA and the Federalist Society?

[WuWei]

Who made the ABA the “accrediting board”?

[WuWei]

@Borgia_dude

Cool. So it is a distraction.

Do you see the vast differences between the ABA and the Federalist Society?

There are a few differences. One vast. The ABA managed to dupe the ignorant.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

What did I say that was incorrect? Race, sex, religion all identities. All identities used to narrow a pool of potential SC judges over our entire history.

Selecting based on identity is cringe. Are “progressive” and “conservatives” also “identities”?

How about selection on merit? How would that be?

I have yet to see any real critique on KBJ based on merit. At best we are getting this nonsense about how the “most racist president since LBJ” committed to, and then nominated a black woman

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

Cool. So it is a distraction.

Do you see the vast differences between the ABA and the Federalist Society?

There are a few differences. One vast. The ABA managed to dupe the ignorant.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

I have yet to see any real critique on KBJ based on merit. At best we are getting this nonsense about how the “most racist president since LBJ” committed to, and then nominated a black woman

In this very thread I have clearly stated my objection is not about Ketesha or even her cringey crittiness.

Brandon is the bad actor here. He had a chance to set up for success and instead took the low road.

You© applaud him for it like it is some kind of virtue.

@PurpnGold
Is Jackson a:

1. Qualified judge who happens to be a black woman?
2. A black woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

I will be forwarding your answer to Crenshaw.

[WuWei]

Is Judge Jackson a

• Qualified judge who happens to be a black woman?
• A black woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

You said in a prior exchange between us that he didn’t say he was looking for qualified candidates.

Quote it

@PurpnGold

Then you send me a video saying he promised something (when he never uttered the word) AND for bonus points showing him saying qualified.

Thanks buddy

He didn’t utter the words “African American?”

Ok

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

And qualified. I mean… he’s not nominating Oprah or Michelle Obama

There are no qualifications. Well, other than race and gender.

Ok

@WuWei

@FloridaYankee

That she be qualified is of equal importance to being a black woman, likely as rated by the ABA.

Funny, Brandon didn’t mention it. As Meatloaf sang, “Two out of three ain’t bad…”

Ok

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

I have yet to see any real critique on KBJ based on merit. At best we are getting this nonsense about how the “most racist president since LBJ” committed to, and then nominated a black woman

In this very thread I have clearly stated my objection is not about Ketesha or even her cringey crittiness.

Brandon is the bad actor here. He had a chance to set up for success and instead took the low road.

You© applaud him for it like it is some kind of virtue.

@PurpnGold
Is Jackson a:

1. Qualified judge who happens to be a black woman?
2. A black woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

I will be forwarding your answer to Crenshaw.

It is a virtue to, at long last, appoint a black woman (and third black person ever) to the court.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

What did I say that was incorrect? Race, sex, religion all identities. All identities used to narrow a pool of potential SC judges over our entire history.

Selecting based on identity is cringe. Are “progressive” and “conservatives” also “identities”?

How about selection on merit? How would that be?

Yes they are identities. Just like “evangelical” “lgbtq” “black” “disabled” “veteran”

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

I have yet to see any real critique on KBJ based on merit. At best we are getting this nonsense about how the “most racist president since LBJ” committed to, and then nominated a black woman

In this very thread I have clearly stated my objection is not about Ketesha or even her cringey crittiness.

Brandon is the bad actor here. He had a chance to set up for success and instead took the low road.

You© applaud him for it like it is some kind of virtue.

@PurpnGold
Is Jackson a:

1. Qualified judge who happens to be a black woman?
2. A black woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

I will be forwarding your answer to Crenshaw.

Of course 1.

Is ACB a:

1. Qualified judge who happens to be a woman?
2. A woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

I will be forwarding your answer to Rufo.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Ok

Did he utter the words “African-American”?

@PurpnGold

Ok

Per the Constitution. Prove me wrong.

@PurpnGold

Ok

There wasn’t just one quote. You fell for a linguistic trick. It is called echolalia. Often used in advertising.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

It is a virtue to, at long last, appoint a black woman (and third black person ever ) to the court.

@PurpnGold

Of course 1.

Is ACB a:

1. Qualified judge who happens to be a woman?
2. A woman who happens to be a qualified judge?

I will be forwarding your answer to Rufo.

Well, damn.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Ok

Did he utter the words “African-American”?

@PurpnGold

Ok

Per the Constitution. Prove me wrong.

@PurpnGold

Ok

There wasn’t just one quote. You fell for a linguistic trick. It is called echolalia. Often used in advertising.

I provided quotes, now the backtrack.

Duck meme?

[FreeAndClear]

@Piper

Anthea Butler claims speak for all black women. From the MSNBC article: KBJ was - “Getting vilified by people who are neither her intellectual nor moral peers.” LOL

She was being questioned on her testimony, background and her beliefs. That background is a person’s defense.

Enjoy

Judge Amy Barrett's Confirmation

The hearings start tomorrow, should be an interesting show. Any predictions? I predict they have been told to lay off the religion, but at least one of them won’t have the self control to do it.