Without papers? Mostly their family members or friends.
1 Like
We’re off topic.
Or… hospitality corporations.
Let’s get back on topic please.
What does that have to do with the 1st?
It’s called purging our military of anyone that doesn’t toe white elitist libs line.
2 Likes
And its been very effective, it seems.
While threats of violence are wrong and should be investigated, the 1st amendment doesn’t guarantee the right to speak a universities.
What if they receive funding from the government? Should they be getting government funding?
1 Like
You don’t think it might be a bit problematic if universities that receive government funding are required to provide a platform and all the organization, work, and infrastructure required to open the auditorium at night, provide lighting, sound, etc… to anyone who wants to? Not to mention all the security required if someone is controversial?
Everything.
The Rationalization of the Repression.
They were all invited.
1 Like
If they have government funding and if they rent out a place for speakers, they cannot discriminate based on the content of that speech.
1 Like
How so?
The 1st amendment doesn’t guarantee the right to speak a universities.
They were invited.
1 Like
Kendi supports restricting the 1st amendment? And he’s representative of the majority opinion of Democrats?
Read the link, then read Kendi again.
He’s representative of your opinion.
Didn’t that guy get booted from speaking at CPAC?
