2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 2)

Continuing the discussion from 2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 1).

Previous discussions:

You are arguing correlation. That’s called a trigger

This is going to be the greatest thread EVER!!!

:champagne:

image

we were so young and innocent then

@system

i blame you for this

1 Like

Team Trump is losing Ben Shapriro as well.

And you’re arguing yourself into another black hole.

To be fair he’s quite small, gets misplaced easily if you don’t put him back in the cupboard.

1 Like

We’re in an election fraud thread, a second iteration, without there ever being fraud. But yeah please make a more detailed summary of a video even though they gave one.

2 Likes

it’s not easy making up excuses to avoid uncomfortable truths.

the judge hearing a lwsuit trying to block congress from voting on wednesday has threatened sanctions on the lawyers for the plantiffs.
evidently they didnt even bother serving or notifying the defendants.

in thw judges order he said
“Their failure to make any effort to serve or formally notify any Defendant … renders it difficult to believe that the suit is meant seriously,” the judge wrote. "Courts are not instruments through which parties engage in such gamesmanship or symbolic political gestures. As a result, at the conclusion of this litigation, the Court will determine whether to issue an order to show cause why this matter should not be referred to its Committee on Grievances for potential discipline of Plaintiffs’ counsel.

Good. its time to start disciplining the lawyers who have presented case after case with no evidence.

fine them and disbar the worst offenders…

1 Like

I watched it. Essentially the Sec of State office representative re-affirmed that nothing on the call from Saturday could impact the tally even close to a # to change the declared winner. Maybe a few votes here and there by nothing rising close to the level of 11,000+.

The video from Nov 3rd at the State Farm Arena that went viral was discussed in time frames. No reason was cited for why observers were not present into the night.

Is that the one where the participants announced that they were through vote counting, watched the official watchers leave without commenting, and then began pulling out huge amounts of votes not yet counted and began the real work?
There is no refutation for that action.

2 Likes

Yeah that is the one. The one that has had thousands of comments. The one where every move in the video has been explained and shown that there was no fraud going on.

Today’s press conference once again went over this very claim… again.

yeah… there is. the FBI and GBI did not find anything wrong, the entire video was watch by Sterling along with WSBTV and nothing wrong was found. it was one of the many refutation, again, talked about today

â– â– â– â– â– â– â–  groundhog day

1 Like

They can go over it a thousand times. It is still a valid discrepancy.
The people in charge knew that the watchers reasonably believed the counting was over based on the actions of the people in the room.
No effort was made to call them back.
Go over it a thousand times, it is still there.

The thing is though, that the chain of custody of the ballots is secure and there were freaking cameras on them the entire time. A hand recount of the entire state shows that the original count was very accurate.

So what is to be gained from continually bringing up this nonevent of counting ballots?

1 Like

What is to be gained by denying that it was an irregularity to get rid of the official watchers and then beginning counting again without trying to reach them?
There is a reason for those watchers. When they are removed before the real counting continues, that is a discrepancy.
I would not bring it up if people didn’t keep saying “debunked”.

Did it change the results one bit?