The virus is not a law enforcement or terrorism issue. If they want to grill someone for exact details they should have the Head’s of the NIH and CDC appear.
Way to go out on a limb and point out that this would affect the supply chain. You did also say this six days ago:
1 Like
Oh, I see. You aren’t familiar with the mission of the DHS.
Here you go:
1 Like
Actually jus the other day you said the supply chain wouldn’t be effected right away because most companies had switched to factories ousted of china and most companies stockpile inventories.
I’ll try to find the post.
Too bad this is an international issue.
2 days ago you said this:
America just had its first case not unrelated to anyone traveling from China.
On Feb 21st we didn’t have the reports as to the interruption to the supply chain coming out yet.
Everything I said in that post was correct and remains correct.
No ■■■■ Sherlock, tell us something else everyone already knows like it’s some sort of revelation!
1 Like
You’re right. Now read it again very slowly. Because of the trade war and US manufactures and importers having already moved their supply chain outside of China the effects on the US should be less serious than for countries who didn’t.
Its not just a bad look, but its really bad how the Dems have jumped in to take advantage of this illness, already fantastically blaming it on Trump.
I’ve never seen such…glee…over a deadly disease.
3 Likes
But while in California, she had time off, and strolled around Koreatown (in article), and has also been to Israel. Maybe this would explain that mystery case in California.
It is? Seriously? When did you figure that out?
You are the one trying to blame “panic” on a single political party in one country.
But they are post-born.
We’re discussing events in the US. Context matters.
Stock market…must protect at all costs.
1 Like
Children to this point are the least effected.
Because it’s an economic issue.
