(emphasis mine)
That’s an oxymoron.
Neither supports authoritarianism when using the traditional understanding of the word.
They like to beat up bigots.
Not remotely similar. The Sturmabteilung was part of the Nazi party and had leadership.
Link to BLM torching businesses.
Jan. 6th
Voter Suppression laws.
1 Like
Godwin law?
The exact leadership of Antifa remains a state secret. The FBI denies that the leadership exists, much like they denied the existence of the Mafia for decades.
According to an undercover reporter, Antifa members go through extensive training on how to maximize injuries and intimidation to anyone who opposes them. The leadership of Antifa appears to have connections to leftist groups in Europe. See video 2:20:
Antifa has all the characteristics of a fascist paramilitary organization that is operating with at least the tacit approval of the FBI. Supporting Antifa fits right into their past operations to attack political opponents:
What is the COINTEL program? Is it relevant today? - Outside The Beltway - Hannity Community
1 Like
Apparently they elude our crack intelligence service that can only operate from capitol video footage.
As much of a waste as the 80 billion in assets the Taliban scored.
2 Likes
Well isn’t that a convenient answer…lol
Sorry man, but that is all ■■■■■■■■ conspiracy theory nonsense. The FBI isn’t involved because Antifa isn’t an organization much less a national one. This would be a local law enforcement situation.
The NSA and FBI certainly know. Why haven’t they done anything to disrupt Antifa?
The logical explanation is the FBI has its agents/informers in leadership positions in Antifa and considers Antifa to be a useful ally.
3 Likes
Yes. American exceptionalism has come to mean that Americans are exceptionally naive and gullible.
The FBI has supported similar front groups to use violence and intimidation in the past:
In 1971 in San Diego, the FBI financed, armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former members of the Minutemen anti-communist paramilitary organization, transforming it into a group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.
In the Vietnam era, the targets were anti-war groups. Now the targets are Trump supporters or anyone who vocally objects to the party line from Washington.
The FBI is just going back to its old tricks. The difference is that now the surveillance technology has massively improved, and the FBI/CIA effectively control most of the media.
2 Likes
There is zero evidence that the FBI has any ties to Antifa. Conspiracy theory. Why can’t you just accept Antifa for who they say they are?
In the Vietnam era, the targets were anti-war groups. Now the targets are Trump supporters or anyone who vocally objects to the party line from Washington.
If Antifa were being sicked on anyone who vocally objects to the party line from Washington there were be a whole lot more incidences.
The FBI has done an incredibly bad job of controlling violence and prosecuting Antifa terrorism.
Either it is in bed with Antifa, or it is incredibly incompetent. Either way the FBI should be defunded immediately.
1 Like
I prefer to simply avoid putting myself into any kind of confrontational situation. I’ve been able to do that successfully for all of my 70 years.
1 Like
There is no national Antifa, its a bunch of independent local groups, so wouldn’t that be more of a local/state law enforcement situation than the jurisdiction of the FBI?
No. You’re overthinking this. Take a deep breath and settle down. I’ll explain it for you. (And you still won’t get it).
If a group dons combat gear and does unprovoked beatings of people with the intent of shutting down their voices then yes, they are fascists. Are you catching on yet? Answer: Nope.
2 Likes
How do you know it was unprovoked?
When did fascism stop meaning: " a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition"
Like most Libs they are quite the opposite of what they say they are.
1 Like
They are. They obviously felt safe attacking that group in LA. 
1 Like
If “Red Guard” is a better term, I’ll change it accordingly.
I’m no longer playing those games. It was the same routine for months - BLM organizes a “protest,” violence follows some events, then BLM automatically claims they have no association with the violent elements that repeatedly show up at said BLM events, all while their leadership claims “Looting is reparations.”
4 Likes
