Feminists are sort of like dogs & cats chasing their tails (forgiveness asked of dogs and cats who engage in this behavior, they’re actually amusing. Feminists are not.)
Anyway they claim to be in favor of women, yet support legalization of the procedure that ends the lives of female babies more than males).
They won’t speak out against it ‘cause they don’t want to appear to be ending “women’s freedom to choose”, which in fact is outside third parties’ freedom to coerce and bully.
It’s rather running around in circles. I’ve more respect for the late Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who pushed the so called pro choice argument onto the Democratic Party platform, eventually abandoning the movement & converting to Catholicism.
At least he was up front about not being a feminist.
Of course i disagree. There is a right to privacy even if it’s not spelled out.
I did cite it. Lawrence v Texas.
Voter ID.
Vaccination cards are one thing. Being asked to present them is wrong in my opinion. Thought i could see the argument for them i disagree with it
Also just a sidenote it’s arguable though it’s a stretch to say that the vaccination cards or presenting them violates the right to freedom of association rather than privacy necessarily.
Okie dokie. So when you posted that response. You meant what exactly? That i was wrong when i said it is in the constitution and when i said it emanates.
I guess can’t ever be right arguing with a contrarian.
