In the very same post, you decry trolling and then confess to it.
In the very same post, you decry trolling and then confess to it.
Me being entertained by the political musings of others isn’t trolling. Geez get a dictionary.
You are really super bad at this whole thing.
For example:
New crime: Thirsty while Black. http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/08/12/man-accused-filling-water-cup-with-soda-at-fast-food-restaurant-tased-charged-with-robbery.html Edit: some want to challenge me on whether this guy is black. I posted proof below that he is darker than Valerie Jarrett.
About as obvious of a troll thread as possible. Dishonest, misleading, hell straight up false title, designed and meant to illicit negative knee jerk responses, not engage in any sort of meaningful debate. And that isn’t even the most recent.
Attreyu:Just like Mccabe, wont stop him from being criminally referred by the IG! Mr Huber will make a decision on Strzok and Mccabe at the conclusion of the final IG report.
What exactly do you think they could prosecute him for?
That doesn’t enter into their discussion. Only putting the word “prosecute” out into the ozone makes them feel like they’ve accomplished something.
The Steele dossier has not been discredited.
“reporter”.
The only thing that seems to be credited is that Fusion lobbied Derepaska a friend of Putin and Mueller for fake information! The FBI already knew about Carter Page, and according to NY Post it was Fusion who set up the Don Jr meeting, hints why Don Jr has not been indicted yet. This is all backfiring.
Just like Mccabe, wont stop him from being criminally referred by the IG! Mr Huber will make a decision on Strzok and Mccabe at the conclusion of the final IG report.
i guess there is always hope.
Call_me_Ishmael:In the very same post, you decry trolling and then confess to it.
Me being entertained by the political musings of others isn’t trolling. Geez get a dictionary.
You are really super bad at this whole thing.For example:
ARRESTED: Black man who filled water cup with soda
About as obvious of a troll thread as possible. Dishonest, misleading, hell straight up false title, designed and meant to illicit negative knee jerk responses, not engage in any sort of meaningful debate. And that isn’t even the most recent.
hey, that poster swears he doesn’t watch Fox or listen to Rush. I guess that link to a Fox article was just, what, coincidence.
It offends you that I dont watch or listen to Fox… doesn’t it? It makes your narrative out to be a lie.
But I do survey many news sources on the internet… Fox no more than others.
It offends you that I dont watch or listen to Fox… doesn’t it? It makes your narrative out to be a lie.
But I do survey many news sources on the internet… Fox no more than others.
Why would anyone be offended by what you do or do not watch?
Call_me_Ishmael:It offends you that I dont watch or listen to Fox… doesn’t it? It makes your narrative out to be a lie.
But I do survey many news sources on the internet… Fox no more than others.
Why would anyone be offended by what you do or do not watch?
Ask @CaughtInTheMiddle . Pretty sure it is because I prove your narrative to be a lie.
hey, that poster swears he doesn’t watch Fox or listen to Rush. I guess that link to a Fox article was just, what, coincidence.
It probably doesn’t surprise you the number of threads that exist here that are near or are verbatim quotes or topics brought up specifically on the Rush and Sean shows. That probably shouldn’t be all that surprising considering the website we are on.
What gets me is how often people will claim they think for themselves, at the same time claiming to not even watch or listen to said shows, and yet coincidentally parroting CEC material.
CaughtInTheMiddle:hey, that poster swears he doesn’t watch Fox or listen to Rush. I guess that link to a Fox article was just, what, coincidence.
It probably doesn’t surprise you the number of threads that exist here that are near or are verbatim quotes or topics brought up specifically on the Rush and Sean shows. That probably shouldn’t be all that surprising considering the website we are on.
What gets me is how often people will claim they think for themselves, at the same time claiming to not even watch or listen to said shows, and yet coincidentally parroting CEC material.
They parrot me dude.
Several of us are the thought engines of anti-lib activism.
And before you ask… yes… yes… it is a heavy and solemn burden.
CaughtInTheMiddle:hey, that poster swears he doesn’t watch Fox or listen to Rush. I guess that link to a Fox article was just, what, coincidence.
It probably doesn’t surprise you the number of threads that exist here that are near or are verbatim quotes or topics brought up specifically on the Rush and Sean shows. That probably shouldn’t be all that surprising considering the website we are on.
What gets me is how often people will claim they think for themselves, at the same time claiming to not even watch or listen to said shows, and yet coincidentally parroting CEC material.
yeah, some tend to run from it. weird.
hey, that poster swears he doesn’t watch Fox or listen to Rush. I guess that link to a Fox article was just, what, coincidence.
It probably doesn’t surprise you the number of threads that exist here that are near or are verbatim quotes or topics brought up specifically on the Rush and Sean shows. That probably shouldn’t be all that surprising considering the website we are on.
What gets me is how often people will claim they think for themselves, at the same time claiming to not even watch or listen to said shows, and yet coincidentally parroting CEC material.
yeah, some tend to run from it. weird.
And lie like a rug about it.
LouC: Call_me_Ishmael: LouC:Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.
Oh well.
Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.
You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?
I am not being dishonest. Nor am I pretending otherwise. There is no “for whom”.
No need to explain.
Just as I thought, you had nothing, hence no need to explain.
What happens to that money if there aren’t any legal fees?
Call_me_Ishmael: LouC: Call_me_Ishmael: LouC:Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.
Oh well.
Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.
You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?
I am not being dishonest. Nor am I pretending otherwise. There is no “for whom”.
No need to explain.
Just as I thought, you had nothing, hence no need to explain.
I collect those “so you got nothing” posts.
They are little trophies… like 10 point antlers on the wall. They are evidence of “deer in the headlights” mentality of libs.
Thank you.
What happens to that money if there aren’t any legal fees?
GoFundMe drives usually have stipulations attached that state the money is returned to the people who donated if certain conditions aren’t met.