Surprisingly Strzok has already raised 30k for lost wages and legal fees. Who would support this cause?

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@madasheck

@Call_me_Ishmael

@LouC

Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.

Oh well.

Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.

You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?

As a federal employee he has First Amendment rights to text whatever he wants in his free time. You have nothing.

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@madasheck

@Call_me_Ishmael

@LouC

Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.

Oh well.

Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.

You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?

As a federal employee he has First Amendment rights to text whatever he wants in his free time. You have nothing.

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

[MidwestIndy]

@Call_me_Ishmael

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

He also took zero actions that in anyway interfered with the election that happened. If you disagree and have proof I’d suggest writing your congressman.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@MidwestIndy

@Call_me_Ishmael

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

He also took zero actions that in anyway interfered with the election that happened. If you disagree and have proof I’d suggest writing your congressman.

It is known that he did in fact take official action to advance his preferred candidate.

My congressman knows. If your solution is to not debate here because any meaningful solution will require congressional action, why do you come here? We are not a lobby whose decisions are sent to congressmen.

[BlueTex]

@Call_me_Ishmael

It is known that he did in fact take official action to advance his preferred candidate.

My congressman knows. If your solution is to not debate here because any meaningful solution will require congressional action, why do you come here? We are not a lobby whose decisions are sent to congressmen.

Help a guy out… What official action did he take?

[madasheck]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@madasheck

@Call_me_Ishmael

@LouC

Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.

Oh well.

Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.

You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?

As a federal employee he has First Amendment rights to text whatever he wants in his free time. You have nothing.

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

Based on what I wrote, you’re making something up if you say he was.

[madasheck]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@MidwestIndy

@Call_me_Ishmael

He did not have protection from any part of our constitution to be part of any FBI “insurance” against a Trump win.

He also took zero actions that in anyway interfered with the election that happened. If you disagree and have proof I’d suggest writing your congressman.

It is known that he did in fact take official action to advance his preferred candidate.

My congressman knows. If your solution is to not debate here because any meaningful solution will require congressional action, why do you come here? We are not a lobby whose decisions are sent to congressmen.

You are just throwing ■■■■ against a wall to see what sticks. And it won’t.

[Camp]

Might as well make the goal 1,000,000.00.

I wanted him fired, not prosecuted…At least not for anything we know at this time.

[BlueTex]

[LouC]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@LouC

Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.

Oh well.

Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.

You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?

I am not being dishonest. Nor am I pretending otherwise. There is no “for whom”.

[Airyaman]

Interesting…are there any taxes involved when you raise money like this?

[LouC]

@Forcefield

They’ve lost the thread, they are triggered, and the walls are closing in around them. They had a fun party the past year or so but the wheels are starting to fall off the tricycle.

The November election followed by Mueller’s report is going to probably land some of them in a padded room.

Oh, I do so hope the room is blue.

[MidwestIndy]

@Call_me_Ishmael

It is known that he did in fact take official action to advance his preferred candidate.

My congressman knows. If your solution is to not debate here because any meaningful solution will require congressional action, why do you come here? We are not a lobby whose decisions are sent to congressmen.

Mmm hmm, and what action was that?

This isn’t a debate. Making ■■■■ up for the sake of an argument isn’t a debate, its trolling.

As to why I am here, entertainment. People making themselves look fool hardy such as you often do, is somewhat entertaining.

[Attreyu]

Just like Mccabe, wont stop him from being criminally referred by the IG! Mr Huber will make a decision on Strzok and Mccabe at the conclusion of the final IG report.

[BlueTex]

@Airyaman

Interesting…are there any taxes involved when you raise money like this?

Not typically…

[BlueTex]

@Attreyu

Just like Mccabe, wont stop him from being criminally referred by the IG! Mr Huber will make a decision on Strzok and Mccabe at the conclusion of the final IG report.

What exactly do you think they could prosecute him for?

[Attreyu]

NO liberals are all about finding ways to circumvent taxes and lobby for criminals like Mccabe and Strzok. Bet the CGI donated to the Strzok go fund me.

[Drs]

@armycowboy

I need to get a job with the FBI and then get fired over politics.

Or open a business and discriminate against gay people.

Both are good for a GoFundMe page.

[MidwestIndy]

@BlueTex

This guy just made what? 2.5x his former yearly salary in less than one day, all because he sent some texts stating his opinion.

If I could get half a million just by stating Donald Trump is a assclown

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@LouC

@Call_me_Ishmael

@LouC

Got to love the hang Strzok type Trump lovers who want to see Strzok in a prison for excessive personal text messaging. Yet some of these same Trump lovers had no problems with any of Scott Pruitt’s abuse of his office, and his equipment, and his everything he could grift off the government aka the tax payers backs.

Oh well.

Got to have priorities, all you Trump lovers, even if for some of you they are so completely tangled up that there are more twisted hypocrisies in your thought processes than twists in a jumbo bag of pretzels.

You are being dishonest if you say it is just for texting. It is the content that is the problem. Yiu know this but you pretend otherwise? Why? For whom?

I am not being dishonest. Nor am I pretending otherwise. There is no “for whom”.

No need to explain.