The poor woman apparently really misses those FBI Russian connection investigations and Impeachment hearings.
Funny and inaccurate twist.
If there were half the covid victims Trump would have been besmirched just the same.
Trump vaccine saved us another year of authoritarian malfeasance.
Open to the general public, maybe, open to unlawful protestors, no.
Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Jezcoe: zantax:Oh wait, she just called again to say she would actually prefer to have been treated like the liberals who invaded the Senate building instead. No tear gas or headshots involved.
Quite silly… I know you need some whataboutism and that is stupid enough but at least don’t claim that she was shot in the head.
Shoulder shots whatever. And I know outrageous to compare liberals invading the Senate building to conservatives invading the capital, totally different things that can’t be compared. Maybe they could have just pounded on the doors of the capital like the liberals did the supreme court.
Perhaps you should list the similarities and dissimilarities between the two events. It might be educational for us.
Sure, main difference is the liberals were allowed to walk in and were then arrested.
Ok. Any other differences?
Not that I can think of, both buildings weren’t open to protestors. That’s why they arrested them.
Ok. To be clear, that is the only difference you can see?
Also for clarity, what date for the liberal invasion of the senate so I can look it up?
Powerful videos show 'Dreamers' storming Senate office building | Mashable
There ya go.
Thanks. So in your view, the only difference is the protesters were allowed to walk in. Was the Hart Building open to the public at the time? Not Heller’s office, the Hart Building?
Open to the general public, maybe, open to unlawful protestors, no.
At what point did the protest become unlawful?
zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Jezcoe: zantax:Oh wait, she just called again to say she would actually prefer to have been treated like the liberals who invaded the Senate building instead. No tear gas or headshots involved.
Quite silly… I know you need some whataboutism and that is stupid enough but at least don’t claim that she was shot in the head.
Shoulder shots whatever. And I know outrageous to compare liberals invading the Senate building to conservatives invading the capital, totally different things that can’t be compared. Maybe they could have just pounded on the doors of the capital like the liberals did the supreme court.
Perhaps you should list the similarities and dissimilarities between the two events. It might be educational for us.
Sure, main difference is the liberals were allowed to walk in and were then arrested.
Ok. Any other differences?
Not that I can think of, both buildings weren’t open to protestors. That’s why they arrested them.
Ok. To be clear, that is the only difference you can see?
Also for clarity, what date for the liberal invasion of the senate so I can look it up?
Powerful videos show 'Dreamers' storming Senate office building | Mashable
There ya go.
Thanks. So in your view, the only difference is the protesters were allowed to walk in. Was the Hart Building open to the public at the time? Not Heller’s office, the Hart Building?
Open to the general public, maybe, open to unlawful protestors, no.
At what point did the protest become unlawful?
At the point they came together to protest without a permit. Or left the area they had a permit for.
Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Borgia_dude: zantax: Jezcoe: zantax:Oh wait, she just called again to say she would actually prefer to have been treated like the liberals who invaded the Senate building instead. No tear gas or headshots involved.
Quite silly… I know you need some whataboutism and that is stupid enough but at least don’t claim that she was shot in the head.
Shoulder shots whatever. And I know outrageous to compare liberals invading the Senate building to conservatives invading the capital, totally different things that can’t be compared. Maybe they could have just pounded on the doors of the capital like the liberals did the supreme court.
Perhaps you should list the similarities and dissimilarities between the two events. It might be educational for us.
Sure, main difference is the liberals were allowed to walk in and were then arrested.
Ok. Any other differences?
Not that I can think of, both buildings weren’t open to protestors. That’s why they arrested them.
Ok. To be clear, that is the only difference you can see?
Also for clarity, what date for the liberal invasion of the senate so I can look it up?
Powerful videos show 'Dreamers' storming Senate office building | Mashable
There ya go.
Thanks. So in your view, the only difference is the protesters were allowed to walk in. Was the Hart Building open to the public at the time? Not Heller’s office, the Hart Building?
Open to the general public, maybe, open to unlawful protestors, no.
At what point did the protest become unlawful?
At the point they came together to protest without a permit. Or left the area they had a permit for.
What point is that?
WuWei:Oh come now, you have repeatedly claimed she broke it. Now it could have been “someone else”?
Do you really think this is a solid argument?
No one likes a pedant.
I absolutely do. You should be ashamed embarking on your career and accusing people without proof. Tsk, tsk.
Camp:It was political. No difference.
So trying to overturn a lawful election is “just political” now.
Got it.
Of course it’s political.
Axxowiz:Got to like the tactic milk January 6th while ignoring the ■■■■ show in other cities burning, rioting, and looting for the other 364 days. Republicans should take note.
We have had civil unrest before.
Jan 6th was something new.
Was it? What was novel about it?
At the point they came together to protest without a permit. Or left the area they had a permit for.
Equivalency denied.
zantax:She didn’t get that far before she was met with violence. Unlike liberals in the Hart building.
Lol she was bashing down the door to the Speaker’s Lobby.
Prove it.
Was it? What was novel about it?
You guys have all become super iffy on peaceful transfers of power, that’s for sure.
Prove it.
Lol it’s on video.
You won’t make her into Vicki Weaver no matter how hard you try.
WuWei: TheDoctorIsIn:How does it make a difference, to the cop who shot her?
How did he know she wasn’t fleeing the mob?
Are you serious? Come on, normally you discuss things in much better faith than this.
We are discussing the law.
And bragging about in on Facebook.
Now there’s a crime.
WuWei:Was it? What was novel about it?
You guys have all become super iffy on peaceful transfers of power, that’s for sure.
“You guys”
WuWei:Prove it.
Lol it’s on video.
You won’t make her into Vicki Weaver no matter how hard you try.
No it isn’t.
I’m not trying to make her anything.
You guys”
Yes, you guys. Whatever you’re calling yourselves now. The true believers and those who claim to be just riding with Trump for practical reasons event though every long con in history simply tricks the mark into thinking they’re working with the con man and getting over on someone else.
No it isn’t.
I’m not trying to make her anything.
Yes you are. You want to make her a martyr. And it’s just not working, because get this, charging like a moron through a door with men with guns on the other side during a riot just doesn’t pull the heartstrings like an innocent mother and child killed by feds no matter how much you minimize the actual riot.
Pfft, I can’t speak for Sneak but I am pretty sure he is as happy to see the back side of Trump as I am.