Except you know the LOI signed with a sanctioned russian bank to build moscow tower, with ongoing negotiations during the campaign, and trumps campaign manager being a pro russian ukranian asset, that worked for the exiled ukranian ex president that lives in Russia. Lets not even start with Stone, wikileaks, and the trump tower meeting.
There’s no “Direct” proof. But there’s a lot of indirect evidence, such as multiple secret meetings with Russians that various people lied under oath and that concerned Trump enough that he made repeated public lies to attempt to cover them up, which is of course someone who is completely innocent would do.
It’s amazing how Trumpers can get 13 degrees of Hillary to any possible potential scandal but somehow can’t add 2 + 2 = Collusion.
To start a criminal investigation? Yes. To start a national intelligence investigation? Yes.
Giving prosecutors carte blanche to go out and look for crimes that haven’t even been reported flies in the face of the very foundations of “American Justice”.
Why don’t you point out in the articles where this “fact” has been established. I have little interest in reading Russian propaganda on some conspiracy theory wild goose chase. Zero Hedge? Seriously?