While it is of course theoretically possible that they could have drafted a Constitutional amendment that actually placed restrictions on abortion with “adequate exceptions,” I think it’s a stretch to claim that a more restrictive Constitutional amendment would have passed, in light of this amendment’s failure.
We know from polling that the abortion laws being passed by a lot of red states are not favored by people in general (of all political stripes).
The PEOPLE seek moderation. Their POLITICAL LEADERS do not.
And the political leaders are going to do everything possible to avoid having the people in their states have direct say over the abortion issue.
And so it was not an “overreaction” to realize the overturning of Roe would lead to states with overly restrictive abortion laws. Many of those laws likely not being favored by the population in those states.
The Kansas result is an aberration because the people got a chance to have a direct voice.
That will not happen in most red states. Divisive, extreme politicians will make sure of it.
Probably, as with most issues in a representative democracy, legislators will run based on their position on this and other issues. People will then vote for the legislator who best represents their position.
Of course you are ignoring the part where extreme politicians are not going to the people…which was why I told you when you “predicted” this that there would be no move towards moderation.
Nah, I’m just smart enough to see how this is all going to play out, because I’m one of those people who doesn’t need polls and links to tell me what the outside world is like.