You can't hold in person elections -- you'll kill thousands! Well . . . ummm . . . maybe not

Your “models” fail! New data! Variables!

No they don’t.

Well-designed models will do just fine helping us identifying hot spots.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.facebook.com/MillennialMillie/posts/2593496897402253&ved=2ahUKEwjE2JuZtYjpAhVfH7cAHTRrDtEQFjACegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw2pdxbcbMiFOCwPTY1sr2UC

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://a12iggymom.wordpress.com/2019/11/12/millie-weaver-whistleblower-leak-documents-show-kentucky-election-was-rigged/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiMhYHg3ojpAhXRXCsKHbo8COoQFjAEegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2rdLBNSNcngJDazrpH1Eeq&ampcf=1

Assuming this is true… then where is the investigation into Kentucky? Did That Election fraud committee get participation from Kentucky? If so, what were the results?

560 votes, out of 1.2 million. .00005% fraud.

Again, assuming this is true.

The commission found nothing.

A member of the commission had to sue the Administration to aquire materials pertinent to that same commission.

They found nothing because there was nothing to find.

The whole thing was a sham.

Kentucky has 3.4 million registered voters.

0.1% of that is 3,400 voters.

Beshear won by 12,000 votes.

Even if there were truly 3,400 fraudulent voters, even if all of them voted, and even if all of them voted for Beshear (all these assumptions, btw, are highly suspect, since the vast majority of these “voters” have been mistakes in the rolls and the people never actually voted), Beshear still wins by nearly 9,000 votes.

Baseline noise.

Still waiting for evidence of systematic and widespread fraud.

If one of you would actually provide it instead of simply believing it exists, this would be a much better conversation.

Only if we test the asymptomatic and even then only for a day!

That depends.

Still won’t require testing everyone every single day.

Right, every single election.

We do.

Elections are monitored, and reports of irregularities are investigated every election.

I did this one time for a local election.

You? We need expertise on this. Professionals.

1 Like

I am.

I have had training.

It’s not that hard.

Ha! They give you a lab coat?

Nah I have my own lab coat.

Has my name on it and everything…a parting gift from the last lab job I ever held.

1 Like

But it only * remains* “baseline noise” if it has legal consequences now and steps are taken to prevent it becoming widespread. Let it go unsanctioned, and it will be allowed as an election strategy for 2020.

It does have legal consequences now.

It’s had legal consequences for decades…hence it being baseline noise for all this time.

Oh really? You never go in for a check up? How about a colonoscopy? Both are done without any evidence of something being wrong. It’s done as a precaution to help insure…nothing does go wrong.

…cuz they refused to cooperate. Now…take another lap and try to catch your tail this time. You can do it. Go!

And they refused to cooperate because not only was the commission operating in an extremely opaque manner. they were asking for information that went above and beyond what the State could legally provide. But of the States that did provide that information nothing was found.

In person voter fraud is not a problem.

Just a minute ago, you were accusing “libs” of being lazy… now you’re here in your own post whining about having to drive 15 minutes to vote.

Can’t make this ■■■■ up…