Felons lose most of their rights up to and including their lives by their own choices and actions.
I’m not infringing on anyone’s rights with any firearm until I use it unlawfully.
Logic failure.
Felons lose most of their rights up to and including their lives by their own choices and actions.
I’m not infringing on anyone’s rights with any firearm until I use it unlawfully.
Logic failure.
No it isn’t, it is and always has been a heavily restricted privilege for only eligible US citizens.
The only “right” is to be treated fairly and equitably under voting laws and regulations.
That’s not an infringement?
The older I get and the more I study the more I agree with the complete restoration of rights for most non violent felons.
We need to do that and eliminate a whole lot of felony crimes which are in reality pretty minor offenses. That alone would solve a whole lot of the problem.
It may not be an issue for you. But it is for those who want free and fair elections.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.foxnews.com/media/stacey-abrams-voter-fraud-myth.amp&ved=2ahUKEwjnvpiZ3IfpAhXV6nMBHSVuCbYQFjAAegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw2Kf0C_fx2gggACwkEbzMpg&cf=1
They keep repeating this mantra like cult members for some reason.
Like JJ essentially saying that if there are studies that decided there is no, or no significant, election fraud in this/these County/counties, there is no, or no significant, election fraud anywhere.
Yep, it’s common. Too bad it’s devoid of fact.
…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
…didn’t want it investigated. Now…why is that?
Except their not.
JayJay: Paul_Thomson: JayJay:This deflection has already been addressed and nauseum.
Wrong characterisation. This answer has already been deflected and nauseum.
If you call facts and data from actual investigations and studies “deflection” that is your problem, not the problem of those who live in actual reality.
Pointing to places where there are no sheep, as election fraud deniers do (metaphorically) does not prove sheep don’t exist.
The only one that actually links to something that I could look up was the California one.
23,000 ineligible registrations…in a state with 20 million registered voters.
So…0.1% of all registered voters…and how many of them actually voted? None of them.
As I said…baseline noise…and is this fraud or error?
Either way…baseline noise.
…didn’t want it investigated. Now…why is that?
Of the states they did investigate, what did they find?
…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
Smyrna:…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
The question that was asked at the beginning and still remains unanswered.
Everything that has been provided thus far supports what actual investigations in the past have uncovered: voter fraud…actual fraud that also results in actual voting…is very very rare…does not rise above the baseline noise of election statistics.
Thus…no one so far has provided a rational reason why we should make voters jump through so many hoops in an attempt to solve a problem that has been shown to barely exist.
Of course…if someone would actually…you know…provide actual DATA showing that voter fraud is widespread…this could be a different discussion.
But if all people are going to offer up is their beliefs backed up by zero evidence…then back and forth we will go.
Forty people in Milwaukee County may have become infected with the coronavirus as a result of participating in Wisconsin elections on April 7.>>No Spike,…
Forty cases in one county linked to participation in the election.
In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson put “life” before “liberty”… and allowing people to cast absentee ballots isn’t even a constraint on people’s liberty.
Smyrna:…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
Test the asymptomatic!!!
PurpnGold: Smyrna:…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
Test the asymptomatic!!!
Asymptomatic voter fraud?
LOL!
WuWei: PurpnGold: Smyrna:…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
Test the asymptomatic!!!
Asymptomatic voter fraud?
LOL!
YES! Test EVERYBODY! Voter fraud is a virus that could tear apart our 'Mocracy!
JayJay: WuWei: PurpnGold: Smyrna:…after investigating. Thanks for proving my point. Now apply that same logic and I’d be satisfied.
But when someone is sick, you have actual evidence of them being sick. Then you investigate.
What actual evidence exists of voter fraud that necessitates a nationwide investigation?
Test the asymptomatic!!!
Asymptomatic voter fraud?
LOL!
YES! Test EVERYBODY!
You don’t have to.
That’s what statistics is for.