Papadopoulus (spelling) was supposed to have been told by a Russian that they had the emails. Why would they go from themselves through a third party and then to Stone when they had already talked to someone in the campaign?
Why would the Trump campaign be soliciting Assange through a radio personality?
Really, the two concepts are mutually exclusive.
Personally I thought none of it should have gotten the attention it did because not only was it stolen but it was taken on the word of Wikileaks to be accurate. And there was no proof it was.
As for penalties, you can’t start telling reporters they can’t report. That’s against the First Amendment. On the other hand, they themselves can make judgments as to what they can write if they deem it not newsworthy.
Unperiod. The few cases that exist seem to say no legal responsibility unless the person receiving hacked emails was somehow involved in encouraging or supporting the hacking.
Not a thing here. Stone has talked about how he wanted to meet Assange and tried to contact him but was never able to. Once he joked about it to a friend,who thought he was serious. Stone has openly explained this many times.
There is nothing to it. He already answered questions about it. Nothing there.
If he passed those emails to the media to get them wider distribution, is that not encouraging or supporting the hacking? And even if he didn’t, being in communication with them as an associate of Donald Trump allows for the fact that he had a reason to be in touch with them.
He made a sarastic joke he was “talking to Assange.” And someone tought he was being serious. Very old news. He talked about that openly a longtime ago.