The whole premise of this thread was crap. Weinstein’s troubles have no political connection except to those who look under every rock for them. The outrage against Weinstein was united across the board. It had nothing to do with politics.
Weinstein illustrated this thread when he promised to “go after the NRA” thinking that would protect him from investigations.
It didn’t, and everyone paying “protection money” to leftist causes noticed.
The anomalous 90% concentration of leftist in Hollywoood (when everywhere else its more like 50 -50) is an illusion, and soon to be destroyed as people realize paying lip service to leftism no longer is a get out of jail free card.
Of course Hollywood reacts to changing tastes. How do you account for the shift in movie genres? Hollywood exists to make money and if a movie or an actor does not bring in the dollars Hollywood moves on. It shows how US centric Americans are. If a movie does not do particularly well in the US then its a disaster regardless if that movie goes on to make a fortune globally.
As for perverts in Hollywood, it has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with money. Perverts and abusers exist in all sections of society; however, those who are rich and well connected have the means and the protection to indulge themselves at their whim. No matter the demographic of the wealthy and the circles they move in, perverts and abusers will exist in those circles.
I guarantee there are just as many abusers in politics and the upper echelons of business as they are in Hollywood.
The local theatre seems to have a handful of people per movie. Since they are capable of showing 14 movies at one time the parking lot may be a bit deceptive.