They were not impeachment attempts but actual impeachments.
Allan
“Drummed up” Articles of impeachment were given a thumbs down by the Senate. Everyone knows that.
So twice being shot down equates to a futile effort to either and removing the person from office and never to have him be eligible to run again for political gain.
And come November affirmation of We The People will validate this very abuse kicking Pelosi out of her speakers chair and many others involved here to the curb.
1 Like
He was still impeached twice. And found not guilty twice.History cannot be changed at whim.
Allan
Allan
Impeachment and conviction are two separate processes. The House impeaches. The Senate convicts. It’s a process defined by the constitution.
It’s similar to an indictment and a conviction in a normal court case.
Expungement does stricken it from the permanent Congressional record. That’s the fact Jack…
The only difference is that it is not a criminal indictment, it’s a political one. The only thing the senate can do is vote to remove the person who was impeached or not.
Allan
Oh? Do you think the goal of expungement is to “right a wrong” or is it to placate Trump?
That doesn’t change the fact of trump being impeached twice.
You can’t 1984 history.
It actually happened.
We had two impeachment trials in the senate. The Chief Justice presiding. The whole 9 yards.
Expunge away.
You can wash the twice impeached stain off of trump.
It’s permanent.
Allan
Allan
So which thing does the GOP want to say is okay for a President to do?
The withholding of foreign aid until an investigation into a domestic political rival is publicly announced or the attempt to overturn the results of an election that he lost?
Which impeachment do they want to expunge?
2 Likes
45 was impeached in the House by a partisan group of hacks with a boatload of hopes, lies and bull ■■■■ for evidence. The first sham should be expunged and removed from the Congressional record. Should the Republicans secure the majority in the House after November each Dimbulbcrat participant of the House Judiciary committee headed up by Jerry Nads should be stripped of their seat for the wanton abuse of the powers that was given to them as a member of that committee.
The second clown show remains to be seen.
Tell that to the statue topplers and 1619 devout.
I already answered that in the first post I made to this thread.
Put away your TDS.
I was stopped by police and questioned once. Is that a black mark against me? The impeachment is like a grand jury indictment. It says that some people think the defendant has a case to answer.
The trial determines whether those people were thinking right. An acquittal says they were not right. They had a weak case.
The Dems cobbled together a weak indictment which the Senate threw out. It’s rather desperate to claim an overturned indictment/impeachment is incriminating or impugning.
So the GOP led Senate decided that the President gets the shiny new powers to 1) withhold foreign aid until that foreign government publicly announces an investigation into a domestic political rival and 2) get to do everything in their power to attempt to overturn the results of an election that they lost.
What a brave new America we have now.
When only the party in power votes lock-step to impeach, and the other party is not on board, it’s meaningless – especially in the current political arena of trying to elevate one’s party by destroying people from the other.
The question that started the thread will just be the reverse of that.
Somehow this cycle of political guerilla warfare has to stop.
Sad to say, I don’t see that happening any time soon.
1 Like
Next up - the OJ Simpson indictment.
It’s was a bipartisan impeachment.
Allan
That did not happen. An investigation was not announced before the aid was released.
That did not happen either.
1 Like
Pepperidge farm remembers
Allan
