Maybe you can. But you haven’t.
And yeah, I have.
Maybe you can. But you haven’t.
And yeah, I have.
My mistake. Forgot about that weird Tucker justification that made no sense.
Meanwhile libs ARE authoritarian dictators.
Yeah my bad. Forgot that Tucker weirdly went there.
yes you did.
then you clarified.
Why do I care what is going on in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia?!” Carlson said. “And I’m serious. Why do I care?
Right.
Why shouldn’t I root for Russia? Which I am.”
Irrelevant to me.
WuWei:I can.
Yet you’ve done one.
Maybe you can. But you haven’t.
And yeah, I have.
No you haven’t.
Let me help:
Who is the worse bad actor for Americans?
0 voters
“Irrelevant” is not “I don’t agree”.
Why don’t you try just arguing with yourself, it’ll save on straw.
Did you vote?
No you haven’t.
Let me help:
Who is the worse bad actor for Americans?
I reject the premise that one is worse than the other. IMO, they are both bad for america in different incomparable ways.
The article that started this thread, I think, is really about people just like you. Who don’t overtly state support for Putin and Russia, but all but do in their deflection and failure to condemn.
Why do you insist on such flat-out dishonest insinuations?
It’s a reflection on their inability to place logic and reasoning ahead of their feelings.
I reject the premise that one is worse than the other.
Yet one is killing Americans.
Yet one is killing Americans.
One has killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and millions around the world, along with their partner in crime…Fauci.
Do over on the poll.
“Irrelevant” is not “I don’t agree”.
Why don’t you try just arguing with yourself, it’ll save on straw.
Again, your failure to unequivocally say you are not rooting for putin suggests a tactic support.
It’s very interesting. I think the article goes to far to flat out claim this attitude as ‘putin loving’, but it is interesting none the less.
WuWei:Well, to characterize that quote from Carlson as an example of admiration is completely dishonest. I stopped reading there.
It’s a common tactic among libs. Strawman of characterization. Trump is “in love with” Putin. Non-libs are in love with Putin. Smear thine enemy, even it it’s a lie.
They know it.
But it’s all they got.
Some people can’t make their candle shine any brighter, they have to resort to blowing other’s out.
You seem to be struggling with simple English.
I knew this would turn into a semantics debate.
You don’t think ‘stronger’ has positive connotations?
So a troll thread?
tnt:I knew this would turn into a semantics debate.
You don’t think ‘stronger’ has positive connotations?
So a troll thread?
Hey, don’t blame the thread…
think it’s fair to say, Trump has some kind of weird thing for authoritarian dictators.
Or instead of your made up drivel, he was trying to build bridges rather than burn them.
Guvnah:It’s a common tactic among libs. Strawman of characterization. Trump is “in love with” Putin. Non-libs are in love with Putin. Smear thine enemy, even it it’s a lie.
They know it.
But it’s all they got.
I think it’s fair to say, Trump has some kind of weird thing for authoritarian dictators.
The love letters with Kim, remember the chocolate cake thing with Xi, and siding with Putin against our intel?
And recently ignoring the invasion of Ukraine and asking Putin to release info on Biden?
Trump is an odd man…I think he has some kind of weird jealousy that these leaders are feared in a way he wasn’t. And he lacked the historical knowledge to realize WHY they are feared. Or he lacked the empathy to care…
Strange stuff.
QED
The OP - and others like it - was but fertile earth from which TDS fruit trees grow.