Certainly not.
What is a mass shooting? There's no consensus definition, but here's what you...
As Americans grapple with horrific shootings in Tulsa, Uvalde and Buffalo it's important to understand the language and data on mass shootings.
Certainly not.
When did women take anything by force? I must have missed the gender war.
FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax:No sorry, it was still given to them.
It is not a gift when there is no other viable alternative.
But there was, continue the status quo, not much women could have done about it.
That’s delusional. The movement was growing steadily (worldwide) and when it reached critical mass one might say, the men acquiesced.
Without male allies it would never have succeeded.
Point is, it was no gift, they earned it 100%. That’s about the only way to get rights in this world both now and historically. You take them by force from the oppressors.
When did women take anything by force? I must have missed the gender war.
They made the cost of denying them the vote too high.
zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax:No sorry, it was still given to them.
It is not a gift when there is no other viable alternative.
But there was, continue the status quo, not much women could have done about it.
That’s delusional. The movement was growing steadily (worldwide) and when it reached critical mass one might say, the men acquiesced.
Without male allies it would never have succeeded.
Point is, it was no gift, they earned it 100%. That’s about the only way to get rights in this world both now and historically. You take them by force from the oppressors.
When did women take anything by force? I must have missed the gender war.
They made the cost of denying them the vote too high.
Only because they gained enough male allies who could vote.
FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax:No sorry, it was still given to them.
It is not a gift when there is no other viable alternative.
But there was, continue the status quo, not much women could have done about it.
That’s delusional. The movement was growing steadily (worldwide) and when it reached critical mass one might say, the men acquiesced.
Without male allies it would never have succeeded.
Point is, it was no gift, they earned it 100%. That’s about the only way to get rights in this world both now and historically. You take them by force from the oppressors.
When did women take anything by force? I must have missed the gender war.
They made the cost of denying them the vote too high.
Only because they gained enough male allies who could vote.
It just would have taken longer without them.
I can’t think of even one country through history where the women have dominated men by force, can you?
zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax: FloridaYankee: zantax:No sorry, it was still given to them.
It is not a gift when there is no other viable alternative.
But there was, continue the status quo, not much women could have done about it.
That’s delusional. The movement was growing steadily (worldwide) and when it reached critical mass one might say, the men acquiesced.
Without male allies it would never have succeeded.
Point is, it was no gift, they earned it 100%. That’s about the only way to get rights in this world both now and historically. You take them by force from the oppressors.
When did women take anything by force? I must have missed the gender war.
They made the cost of denying them the vote too high.
Only because they gained enough male allies who could vote.
It just would have taken longer without them.
No, it would have been impossible without them.
Maybe the FBI is correct? There’s two white guys supremacing this thread.
LAs Vegas: white guy
Columbine: white guys
Sandy Hook: white guyWe could go on.
Denmark, Sweden, Norway 90% (or more) white. Most of the countries in the world that are considered the best places to live are majority white.
I can’t think of even one country through history where the women have dominated men by force, can you?
It’s a different kind of force lol. If they want something bad enough, they will get it.
zantax:I can’t think of even one country through history where the women have dominated men by force, can you?
It’s a different kind of force lol. If they want something bad enough, they will get it.
Doesn’t seem to be happening over most of the globe.
No doubt they’re Black or possibly some other minority.
Notice how they made clear their was extended magazine involved.
FloridaYankee: zantax:I can’t think of even one country through history where the women have dominated men by force, can you?
It’s a different kind of force lol. If they want something bad enough, they will get it.
Doesn’t seem to be happening over most of the globe.
Men hold onto power tenaciously. As do women. Career politicians for example. It’s an uphill battle to dislodge long held systems.
No doubt they’re Black or possibly some other minority.
Notice how they made clear their was extended magazine involved.
…and race was never mentioned?
I know…that’s why I have no doubt it was a Black guys.
Notice feds never say angry Black men are greatest terrorist risks.
I know…that’s why I have no doubt it was a Black guys.
Notice feds never say angry Black men are greatest terrorist risks.
…never,ever.
You could cite the FBI stats on who is killing the most people. There are a lot more killers than just white guys. If one wanted to say most school shooters are white that’s a fair statement. It’s also fair to say that while only composing 13% of the population black people have committed 52% of all homicides.
Here’s the enemy of the people everyone…our MSM…if…you have your eyes open? Do you?
As Americans grapple with horrific shootings in Tulsa, Uvalde and Buffalo it's important to understand the language and data on mass shootings.
Notice when race is mentioned?
The first example is Tulsa; On Wednesday, a gunman killed four people in a shooting at a medical center in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
^^^^^^^^^^ the perp was black ^^^^^^^^^^
Is his skin color mentioned?
Now here’s the second; The attack comes after high-profile shooting massacres in Buffalo, New York, where 10 Black people were killed,
This time race is mentioned? Why is that? The media is doing everything they can to divide us as a nation and it’s obvious…at least to me? How about you?
Why do you go back so many years…just to look for a white guy? The FBI says they’re the number one threat. Post today’s events and let’s see if the FBI is correct? What mass shootings have happened in your neck of the woods?
This is not what the FBI said. They said white supremacist were the biggest domestic terrorist threat. This entire thread is based on a lie.
This is not what the FBI said. They said white supremacist were the biggest domestic terrorist threat. This entire thread is based on a lie.
What is a threat? The greatest threat would be the methodology in which the most people will potentially die, correct? Hmmmmmmmm…so obviously, there are many, many, many examples prevalent so that it substantiates the FBI’s claim…correct? Maybe the lie is what the FBI claimed? This thread is to determine exactly who the liar is? So…post your example of this “biggest domestic terrorist threat” for us all to see. It’s obviously a target rich environment since it’s number one so…please participate and prove the FBI correct? I’ll wait right here for your…truth.