Sure I’ll do what you should have done for you
Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
Excellent. We’re off to a great start. Now we know the definition, let’s keep score and see if the FBI is correct?
Perfect description of Summer of Love.
…and summer has just begun. It must be an omen? 
Augury
I’m getting deja vu.
Despite the helpful definition, something tells me not everyone is going to agree on which crimes fall under it.
I didn’t know BLM was full of white supremacists. 
Do we also need to specify a body count or number of structure destroyed? It seems rather vague if we’re going to keep score.
The number of people murdered to be defined as “mass” for this thread is 4 and thanks for the question.
domestic influences? hello Chicago…
FBI fits that description.
you mean like burning down cities if you don’t like court outcomes?
To be fair I have heard this a lot over the years and who knows maybe it is, it has still yet to play out. I would say the biggest threat is prolonged inflation- followed by a depression and if not a civil war domestic terrorism playing out.
As much as some wants it I don’t think it needs a racist element to play out if everything bad happens simultaneously to any country and the degradation of peoples lives continue it’s not out of possibility civil unrest will continue to grow. All races are suffering right now with inflation.
The biggest threat to America is the breakdown of civil society. Go see the thread “Is this a disturbing trend.” The fact that America has the highest percentage of children born to single parents is likely the biggest contributer to this. Furthermore, absorbing millions of the world’s impoverished citizens is only going to exasperate our problems.
Burning down cities seems to be O.K. with Democrats as long as they are mostly peaceful while doing so.
This needs to be reposted again. Absolutely spot on!
“Right to vote”? 
Where do they get these dumb asses?
From that article.
Haines said men have “always enjoyed” those “same freedoms” without ever having to “earn” them through amendments to the Constitution. “And while it’s fine for people to share something when you don’t think it’s going to cost you anything. When people feel like they are losing something that belongs to them, particularly power, everybody else watch out,” Haines stated, implying that White men will do a lot to maintain their grip on power.
Women didn’t “earn” the vote, white men gave it to them, thanks white guys is what they should be saying. Makes my wife furious when I point that out but it’s not like they conquered men and won the right to vote.
