What's The Point Of Hunter Testifying?

Which part?

Can you provide a link to Hunter Biden wanting Shokin gone? Also do you have evidence of someone other than the fired prosecutor saying Hunter Biden was under investigation?

Ok, a US goon. What part of the government did Parnas work for?

And Rudy. He talked about Rudy.

Why just Burisma? Are they the only corrupt company of interest to Trump?

We shall see… he is under investigation for his shady dealings

And now he is working with shady people.

What the difference between what is happening now using back channels?

Damn the way you keep shifting the goal posts I’m not even sure what stadium we’re in now.

Burisma wanted Shokin Gone, they hired Hunter for his access and influence with his father and magically Joe made him go away by blackmailing the sitting president with a billion dollars in aid.

Federal prosecutors investigating mobsters have always worked with “shady people” to make their cases.

Prove it.

So what? Like it has been already posted, just point to Trump’s kids. This won’t go anywhere.
And if they do the one-for-one the Democrats win. Trump screwed up and you know it.
Bring it on.

Another long series of excuses for Biden being above scrutiny.

The known Biden COI while he was VP is an actionable issue. Potential election 2020 fallout is conjecture.

Biden could have his support increased by showing what an effective corruption fighter he is. It could also turn out that Hunter is a talented and under paid private lawyer.

Never assume.

I have done so numerous times, and the sources are always rejected so what’s the point in doing so again?

You folks aren’t interested in the truth and continually make it painfully obvious.

Which have Trump’s kids been appointed to corrupt companies boards since his election?

What’s The Point Of Hunter Testifying?

Theres no point, its just a distraction. They all know that Trump is guilty as hell.

You must have a terrible head cold WR. Thought for sure you’d smell the sarcasm.

Where you been? Investigators at nearly every federal, state and local law enforcement level including DA and prosecutors offices use “confidential informants” while building cases. Nearly all have “shady” backgrounds or have made plea deals that include cooperation so their degrees of criminality are lessened. To condemn Rudy Giuliani for conducting an investigation of sorts and associating with known “shady people” is naive and foolish.

Joe Biden already did, in public and there’s video evidence to prove it. To deny the “coincidence” of Hunter Biden’s seat on the Board of Burisma and the ouster of Vicktor Shokin as a prosecutor in a corruption case involving Burisma would be complete naïveté!

So, if an action of foreign policy is publicly accepted widely and deeply, it must be blackmail for personal / private purposes separate from the popular public purpose? You’re making no sense.

Was Trump withholding military aid in exchange for corruption reform “blackmail”?

Btw, we aren’t talking about Lee Harvey Oswald :laughing:

It would seem that way if you know nothing about Shokin or international relations at the time.

That is immaterial to what Biden bragged about.

Biden leveraged funding to manipulate Ukranian internal politics.

Shokin could have been eating puppies raw in his office…still not Bidens place to force the obvious.

:dog:

The public and international interest is not immaterial to what Biden bragged about

I know you will continue to ignore context because that’s the only way to defend the conman you adore, but Biden acted publicly, with the support of the President and several international bodies, to address an issue of corruption. Since Shoken was not investigating Burisma or the Biden family there was no personal gain.

Trump acted in secret for personal gain.

As the Sesame Street song goes: “Some of these things are not like the others” but if that point has not sunk in after repeated mention in these forums I am sure it won’t sink in today either.

1 Like

They can’t allow it to sink in as the cognitive dissonance would be uncomfortable.
.
.
.
.WW, PHS

No wonder the transcript(s) of phone conversations between the Presidents were made public by the White House.
Mmm Hmm

1 Like

It absolutely is irrelevant.

Conjecture and hearsay. There are legal ways to remove Shokin without bribes.

:dog: