Can you provide a link to Hunter Biden wanting Shokin gone? Also do you have evidence of someone other than the fired prosecutor saying Hunter Biden was under investigation?
Ok, a US goon. What part of the government did Parnas work for?
And Rudy. He talked about Rudy.
Why just Burisma? Are they the only corrupt company of interest to Trump?
We shall see… he is under investigation for his shady dealings
Damn the way you keep shifting the goal posts I’m not even sure what stadium we’re in now.
Burisma wanted Shokin Gone, they hired Hunter for his access and influence with his father and magically Joe made him go away by blackmailing the sitting president with a billion dollars in aid.
Federal prosecutors investigating mobsters have always worked with “shady people” to make their cases.
So what? Like it has been already posted, just point to Trump’s kids. This won’t go anywhere.
And if they do the one-for-one the Democrats win. Trump screwed up and you know it.
Bring it on.
Another long series of excuses for Biden being above scrutiny.
The known Biden COI while he was VP is an actionable issue. Potential election 2020 fallout is conjecture.
Biden could have his support increased by showing what an effective corruption fighter he is. It could also turn out that Hunter is a talented and under paid private lawyer.
Where you been? Investigators at nearly every federal, state and local law enforcement level including DA and prosecutors offices use “confidential informants” while building cases. Nearly all have “shady” backgrounds or have made plea deals that include cooperation so their degrees of criminality are lessened. To condemn Rudy Giuliani for conducting an investigation of sorts and associating with known “shady people” is naive and foolish.
Joe Biden already did, in public and there’s video evidence to prove it. To deny the “coincidence” of Hunter Biden’s seat on the Board of Burisma and the ouster of Vicktor Shokin as a prosecutor in a corruption case involving Burisma would be complete naïveté!
So, if an action of foreign policy is publicly accepted widely and deeply, it must be blackmail for personal / private purposes separate from the popular public purpose? You’re making no sense.
Was Trump withholding military aid in exchange for corruption reform “blackmail”?
I know you will continue to ignore context because that’s the only way to defend the conman you adore, but Biden acted publicly, with the support of the President and several international bodies, to address an issue of corruption. Since Shoken was not investigating Burisma or the Biden family there was no personal gain.
Trump acted in secret for personal gain.
As the Sesame Street song goes: “Some of these things are not like the others” but if that point has not sunk in after repeated mention in these forums I am sure it won’t sink in today either.