Yea. After the whistleblower became public
Making them public required the approval of the Ukraine.
The fish was off the hook when they came out.
Withholding foreign aid in exchange for a public interest is bribery?
How do you know the report is âfull flawsâ. Have you read it? The IG determined in to be valid and appropriate. How do you know something different?
Iâd like a side of established facts to go with your mudslinging please.
When you do it the way Biden did.
Was there a written condition that Shokin be removed prior to Biden giving them six hours?
With such strong international support there must have been.
If that was the case then bribe isnât the best term.
This was brought up numerous times.
First flaw was that the proper chain of command was not followed.
Rudy isnât law enforcement.
You havenât provide anything showing Burisma wanted Shokin gone.
Apparently Trump isnât interested in the truth either, because if he was he would have went about this differently.
But, but, but. There was no evidence presented of a telephone call in which Trump allegedly (pigs can fly before Trump would have used that expression under those circumstances) said there was no quid pro quo in a telephone call with Ambassador Sondland.
Thatâs correct. The transcript was hidden on the codeword server without appropriate review. Beginning of the chain of evidence that leads to the impeachment of Donald Trump.
But I suppose your knickers are in a twist because the Whistleblower consulted one of Schiffâs staff. Yes they did and that staff member reminded them of the proper chain of command and then it was followed. Thatâs your big deal? Hardly rises to level of a process crime and we know how unimportant Trump supporters think those are.
Why was the actual transcript hidden after the call if you are so concerned about following protocol?
Missed by the proverbial country mile.
No knicker twistin here.
Thankfully President Trump is performing fine and the added scrutiny of impeachment appears to have energized him.
The next flaw is the reliance of opinion over substance. Speaking of suchâŚ
Is the dear Colonel Vindeman still safe and sound after his public testimony that featured editing misadventures and his irrelevant opinion.
Maybe Canada has a defense ministry position for him.
He didnât set up a âshadow foreign policyâ 
he talked about resuming the investigation that the corrupt previous Ukraine administration shut down. President Trump didnât mention a name, that was all on the Democrats and of course Biden himself on video bragging about blackmailing the previous Ukraine administration to fire the prosecutor in the case.
If you want to know why the Bidens have been exposed and the Biden name dragged through the mud, ask those responsibleâŚthe Democrats!!
Are you referring to the point that a Ukrainian investigation would only harm and could not possibly help Joe Biden.
For reference consider How Mueller result has helped Trump. No collision No obstruction.
The GAO found the President acted illegally. Your accuracy about testimony is shown by your not spelling names correctly. Colonel Vindman served his country with distinction which is more than you can say for Cadet Bone Spurs.
Bidens stuck his own foot in his mouth with the brag video in 2018.
That was pretty stupid.
The dear Colonel was not a good witness.
The defense minister joke was entertaining.
Bone spurs showed more guts taking out Soleimani than the us showed in support of the Ukraine before President Trump took office
No I am referring to the absolute nonsense that in the context of the alleged telephone call that Trump would have used the term quid pro quo. And letâs not forget there was no evidence presented that verified the telephone call happened. Not a scintilla of evidence.
VeryâŚ
He had to read it from written notes (sharpie!) for Godâs sake.
