So there is no downside in your opinion to insulting everyday citizens.?It always has a positive outcome?
Candidates wouldnât keep doing it otherwise.
People believe the swing voters are who you want to get.
Thatâs false.
The push is to get more and more of your base out while depressing the turnout of your rivalâs base.
Been that way at LEAST since George W. Bush now.
Please letâs get real hereâŚyou wouldnât have voted for a Hillary no matter how kindly she thought of you.
Your whole OP ignored the fact that it didnât start with Obama or Hillary.
D Trump accused T Cruzâs dad of being involved in the assassination of JFK. Is T Cruzâs loyalty to D Trump in any doubt?
Candidates wouldnât keep doing it otherwise.
I guess weâll have to disagree. Candidates might be doing this because they are filled with hate and contempt for anyone who disagrees with them. It may simply be a lack of self control. Thanks for your input.
Since you are the one who stated it, no doubt you got it.
Iâm the one who stated it?
Yes. They want to make having a defined and defended border, enforcement of immigration laws, defense of the 2nd amendment, individual rather than group rights, among other beliefs, to be illegitimate beliefs. People who hold them should be shunned, not debated.
And thus Trump must not be legitimized as President, either.
I think he thinks not liking Trump is illegitimate. And that is a trait of his I dislike. But as I have said, policy comes first.
altair1013: JayJay:To ensure tribal loyalty.
Maybe. But it also eliminates totally the possibility of winning over any of the people who have been insulted. So does it help? Or does it hurt? I donât think that it helped Hillary at all. Itâs a calculated risk.
PleaseâŚshe was never going to win over any of the people she insultedâŚjust like Trump will not.
Itâs not a risk at all.
You sound like those who defend such claims as âdemocrat plantationâ.
JayJay:Candidates wouldnât keep doing it otherwise.
I guess weâll have to disagree. Candidates might be doing this because they are filled with hate and contempt for anyone who disagrees with them. It may simply be a lack of self control. Thanks for your input.
Politicians do it because it works.
Itâs not at all like that but thanks for playing.
Itâs not at all like that but thanks for playing.
No? Strange.
JayJay:Itâs not at all like that but thanks for playing.
No? Strange.
Subtle but distinct difference.
WuWei: JayJay:Itâs not at all like that but thanks for playing.
No? Strange.
Subtle but distinct difference.
Nuancy. Strange.
JayJay: WuWei: JayJay:Itâs not at all like that but thanks for playing.
No? Strange.
Subtle but distinct difference.
Nuancy. Strange.
Itâs one thing to say people stay in their tribes because they agree with policies and refuse to examine the good and badâŚquite another to accuse them of be)no to dumb to know better and just being lured by free stuff.
Is it?
What are you another leftist who thinks the dems are kings?
My gosh the dems have the house they get to tell everyone what to do. Seems they sang a different tune when the roles were switched.
What a bunch of cry babies.
I will say the senate showed a lot more class and didnât act like children.
Unambiguously and unequivocally I am not a Democrat. I support one political party: the centre-left Australian Labor Party.
What are you another leftist who thinks the dems are kings?
My gosh the dems have the house they get to tell everyone what to do. Seems they sang a different tune when the roles were switched.
What a bunch of cry babies.
I will say the senate showed a lot more class and didnât act like children.
Hereâs a question for you.
If Ginsberg dies or retires right nowâŚwill you ask Mitch McConnell not to consider any of Trumpâs nominees until the people have spoken in November?
McConnell is already on record as saying he will not do the same thing this time that he did in 2016.
Absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
So thank you for admitting that McConnellâs 2016 argument was â â â â â â â â â
WuWei:Absolutely not.
So thank you for admitting that McConnellâs 2016 argument was â â â â â â â â â
It wasnât. It was valid in 2016.
Politicians do it because it works.
I havenât seen much evidence of it actually working.