Of course you’re not.
Your posting as deliberately insincere as it comes around here.
Of course you’re not.
Your posting as deliberately insincere as it comes around here.
The signs are gay.
Oh. OK.
What is the problem with those signs? What is the article missing?
The New York Times is finally admitting
One woman writing an opinion column is not the “New York Times.”
Yes, the “news” department has never corrected their early reporting that dismissed the likely lab origin, and the current opinion piece simply claims that “we were misled”.
Scientists have dismissed suggestions that the Chinese government was behind the outbreak, but it’s the kind of tale that gains traction among those who see China as a threat.
Yes, the “news” department has never corrected their early reporting that dismissed the likely lab origin
I know this was posted here.
A new analysis that began under the Biden administration is released by the C.I.A.’s new director, John Ratcliffe, who wants the agency to get “off the sidelines” in the debate.
Right, they are reporting about the new CIA director.
I have seen no evidence of corrections to their reporting in 2020, such as the earlier link, which dismissed the likely lab origin as a “tale that gains traction among those who see China as threat”.
In addition, the science writer who claimed that discussion of the likely lab leak was “racist” is still working at the paper. The most that the Times can muster is “we were misled”.
New York Times reporter Apoorva Mandavilli deleted a tweet Wednesday night that said the COVID-19 “lab leak theory” had “racist roots.”
NY Times COVID Reporter Deletes Tweet Claiming ‘Racist Roots’ of 'Lab Leak Theory' After Backlash - TheWrap
Apoorva Mandavilli - Wikipedia
Right, they are reporting about the new CIA director.
No, the article is reporting the CIA’s opinion that COVID likely originated in a lab.
I have seen no evidence of corrections to their reporting in 2020,
The linked article right above your post is the evidence you’re looking for.
It is all behind a paywall, and I am not going to pay to support DNC/CIA propaganda.
It is all behind a paywall, and I am not going to pay to support DNC/CIA propaganda.
So you post New York Times articles and complain about New York Times content without actually reading it or knowing what it’s about. Huh.
Can we all agree that we do not have a neutral media? What we do have are weapons of the corrupt, DC establishment?
they knew. it was all they needed at the time to play dictator
"He is a leader who does not have the luxury of opening up his little books to read. Oh my God, maybe, he didn't do it the right way."
Lawwwwwwwwww.
Fox News' Brit Hume and Guy Benson both came to their colleagues' defense on Wednesday after the Trump White House attacked them.
“I watched her too. She plays it straight, covering both sides of a story and has certainly played fair with you,” argued Hume. “You may have a case against some White House reporters, but not
@JacquiHeinrich.”
Dear Brit Hume, you’re an idiot. There doesn’t need to be a case, that’s the whole point.
He went from Roberts to them evil dems in under two sentences.
commences
Jesse Watters mocked Jessica Tarlov for criticizing Trump's administration deporting potentially innocent people to El Salvador, including a "gay barber."
“You’ve been talking about this gay barber and El Salvador with some stupid tattoo for weeks. Weeks, Jessica. It’s just a gay barber,” Watters said as Tarlov mentioned Andry and argued she doesn’t trust that the El Salvadorian government is not “torturing” the prisoners they receive.
“He’s not into you!” Greg Gutfeld quipped.
The worst.
hope for cbs yet, after seeing how ridiculous the segments with Trump were
Paramount's Shari Redstone, in the wake of "60 Minutes" EP quitting the show, said freedom of the press means "giving the facts, not opinions."
we’ll see