This is the gusher guy. Who is also MTG’s boyfriend.
Starting to think this will be a consistent thing.
What consistent thing are you referring to?
1 Like
Conduct that makes me want to post about it in this thread.
WSJ article. Direct-link article top WSJ is behind a paywall.
Link from MSN.com lets you read the article:
Headline says
Israel Chokes Electricity Supply to Gaza to Pressure Hamas on Hostages
But you have to read down deep into the article to see that this got shut off when Hamas destroyed the delivery system in the 2023 attack.
“Israel used to supply Gaza with around half of its total electricity before the current war began, but that infrastructure was damaged by Hamas during the group’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel that sparked the current war in Gaza, and Israel hasn’t fixed it since, the official said.”
But, of course, the nasty Israelis are at fault here. 
I used to have more respect for WSJ.
2 Likes
Be prepared. The hair on fire crew will be here in just a few minutes to blame Trump for another crash.
Looks like the pilot did a remarkable job to avoid crashing into buildings and to minimize the impact to the occupants of the plane.
2 Likes
Newest edition to the Fox News weekend lineup.
Actually, it was fair of Mediate to include more of the statement, which came across pretty good. Of course, the article is based on the idea most people are just going to run with reading the headline, which was one awkward sentence.
Sure she said it but she said it for a good reason!
One awkward sentence lol.
1 Like
Of course. Because of her close personal relationship to Trump. You expect her to not be biased?
Woo HOO! Today’s hair-on-fire issue from the media!!
1 Like
She is the media?
In a thread about the media.
Hair on fire.
Oh. I get it now. You were trying to prove that commentators on the Fox News channel are not all politically unbiased, but tend to favor Republicans or particularly Trump. Yeah, sure. I will grant you that one. Is anyone denying it?
1 Like
In this case, fear is helping.
As a reminder:
The fly-on-the-wall, you-are-here atmosphere that pervades Fire and Fury will undoubtedly sell books. But like other books before it — the 2010 political book Game Change comes to mind — Fire and Fury hardly seems a move in the right direction for well-sourced, evidence-based journalism. Instead it’s a stew of mysteriously sourced dramatic scenes.
Here is a great example of a media report deliberately ignoring the sequioa in the middle of the forest:
We have libs on this board who do the same thing. “I am stating a fact…” Yet that fact does NOT stand alone and refusing to acknowledge another fact makes “truth” a blatant half-truth.
Really there is nothing wrong with the words of the poster. And that’s entirely all the article focuses on.
It’s a shame the left has corrupted something as magnificent as the array of light from a prism.
2 Likes
Well, except for the fact that all people are not equal.
One has to wonder, would she have welcomed someone who came into the room and denounced her sign? 
1 Like
The New York Times is finally admitting that the COVID-natural-origin narrative was a hoax, but they seem to be claiming they were merely incompetent suckers rather than willing participants in the hoax.
2 Likes
Mix up all those words. They were willing suckers.
2 Likes
Why did she have to take those two signs down?
What is the news report ignoring?
I’m not sure what your point is here about libs and half truths.
