âCovertâ appears in an online dictionary as ânot openly acknowledged or displayedâ. Was Crossfire Hurricane openly publish and acknowledged as it happened or was it done covertly?
Perhaps there was a reference to âcovert in the sense as defined by the Hughes-Ryan Amendmentâ, but if so, I missed it.
Covert is a word in the English language. Its use in a particular amendment does not erase its common usage.
What, you never use words that are in the dictionary?
Can I just dead this real quick? A presidential finding or memorandum of notification is sent to the intelligence committees in Congress when the president orders the CIA to undertake covert action as statutorily authorized in the National Security Act of 1947. It has nothing to do with the FBI.
Interestingly enough, in the last 30 years or so, the Supreme Court has cited dictionary definitions in an increasing number of statutory interpretation cases.
That was in 2013 when the FBI broke up a Russian spy ring, Page was brought in to the FBI for questioning because they though he was a Russian asset, but cleared him because he wasnât so bright and they learned it didnât know he was talking with Russian intelligence.
Flash forward to 2016 Page is the a key adviser to a Presidential nominee.
I can understand why some at the FBI might be like âWait is this dude still talking with the Russiansâ
Covert operation overseas by the CIA. Was that the reference for the use of the word âcovertâ here?
A Presidential approval for overseas operations?
They may have given it a term of art for that purpose, but the word âcovertâ existed before that amendment and will exist after.