Well said.
Of course I have. What will you do when I close the doors?
I like it too. Can you have the reverse?
Sounds paternalist.
NoâŚgovernment force is not final any more than any other force is finals.
And yesâŚit did.
You can deny reality until the cows come homeâŚthat doesnât turn reality into unreality.
FinallyâŚagainâŚgame theory is math.
As Samson pointed out it is neither prescriptive or proscriptive.
Again - what will you do when you close your doors?
If you close, we both lose.
Ok⌠so?
Whatâs plain to see?
Does it have to be either/or?
workers rights are stupid.
Of course it is.
No, it didnât.
Ok, so what?
What does that matter to you? You lost your job.
And so did you.
If you are a rational actor, working in your own interest, you wonât close your business out of spite.
Why didnât you ask him that?
No, I gained cash.
a unicorn.
Are you trying to argue that closing your business out of spite is in your own financial best interest?
Without assuming the parties are rational actors working in their own best interest, game theory is useless.
so you donât support stuff like law regulating where you can dump toxic waste.
Um, you answered your own question in the OP. In the Prisonerâs Dilemma, which is clearly the game theory youâre referring to, the first person to seek advantage from power wins.
