Hard to do if your dead, hence the reason for the regulations.
He has acknowledged this.
Iâm 65 years old. How old are you?
Now youâre adding more conditions to your game.
Iâll be an lawyer in a year, I donât care about whatever minimum wage job you employed me in.
See how that works?
Thatâs not necessarily a gain.
Ask yourselves why more companies donât do that right now.
You act as if government force is somehow âoutside the boundsâ of game theory.
Why didnât you ask him that?
I donât know?
Without assuming the parties are rational actors working in their own best interest, game theory is useless.
Then it is useless.
What shall we call my new âonly my best interestâ philosophy?
WuWei:Why didnât you ask him that?
I donât know?
I liked it, but donât be so partisan.
WuWei: TheDoctorIsIn:And so did you.
If you are a rational actor, working in your own interest, you wonât close your business out of spite.
No, I gained cash.
Thatâs not necessarily a gain.
Ask yourselves why more companies donât do that right now.
You act as if government force is somehow âoutside the boundsâ of game theory.
What did you gain?
Of course it is.
I liked it, but donât be so partisan.
Police your own.
Thatâs what being a rational actor means - making decisions based on your own best interest.
WuWei:I liked it, but donât be so partisan.
Poloce your own.
I am.
JayJay: WuWei: TheDoctorIsIn:And so did you.
If you are a rational actor, working in your own interest, you wonât close your business out of spite.
No, I gained cash.
Thatâs not necessarily a gain.
Ask yourselves why more companies donât do that right now.
You act as if government force is somehow âoutside the boundsâ of game theory.
What did you gain?
Of course it is.
If you liquidated (shut the business down) unless you were a bad businessman you lost value in doing so.
If you simply sold the business to someone elseâŚwell then, one of the gameâs players was simply swapped out.
Thatâs what being a rational actor means - making decisions based on your own best interest.
No, it doesnât. Decisions are based on emotion.
If you liquidated (shut the business down) unless you were a bad businessman you lost value in doing so.
Horse â â â â â I can sell it at a profit.
Youâre the one how declared that you were embracing game theory, by the way.
I think itâs a fun exercise, but has significant issues due to exactly what youâve said. Rational Choice Theory is significantly flawed.
Thatâs what being a rational actor means - making decisions based on your own best interest.
This is interesting. How is it in your best interest to allow ⌠DACA for example? Or raise your own taxes?
Unless the profit on the sale outweighs all future profits you would have made keeping the business open, you are losing financially by selling.
And again, this is you adding new conditions to the game.
Youâre the one how declared that you were embracing game theory, by the way.
I think itâs a fun exercise, but has significant issues due to exactly what youâve said. Rational Choice Theory is significantly flawed.
I donât care what we call it.
Unless the profit on the sale outweighs all future profits you would have made keeping the business open, you are losing financially by selling.
Do I? Or can I not take the cash and do something else making more profit and not have to deal with your wants?
What difference does it make to you? Youâre unemployed.