Fair post.
So what? Donât work for them.
There is no such thing as a rational decision-maker.
My best interest.
I know. Iâm not sure what your point is.
Without rational actors, game theory is useless.
You think that you can use government to enforce debt obligation. I assume you also believe you can use government to award you damages for IP infringement.
I donât, Iâll handle it myself.
WuWei:Good answer. What will you do when I close the doors?
Find another job, probably.
Is it in your best interest to shutter your business rather than pay for health insurance, or whatever else it is that I âwantâ?
Then why donât you go find one now?
Perhaps it is. Is it in your best interest for me to close them?
How so?
Because you drag the public into the private.
TheDoctorIsIn:Do you mean âgame theoryâ?
Or are you trying to make some jokes about kids these days?
Hey! This âareâ serious!
Then why are you here?
Samson_Corwell:You think that you can use government to enforce debt obligation. I assume you also believe you can use government to award you damages for IP infringement.
I donât, Iâll handle it myself.
That just shifts the locus of the question.
Perhaps it is. Is it in your best interest for me to close them?
Well, thatâs the thing.
It is in my interest for your store to remain open. But it is also in your best interest for the store to remain open, unless whatever it is that I want would make your business unprofitable.
If you close, we both lose an income source.
Ok. So?
Weâre discussing game theory, are we not? If itâs in my best interest to involve the government, why shouldnât I?
WuWei: Samson_Corwell:You think that you can use government to enforce debt obligation. I assume you also believe you can use government to award you damages for IP infringement.
I donât, Iâll handle it myself.
That just shifts the locus of the question.
Does it? Whatâs the difference?
Government force is not âfinalâ either.
And yesâŚthat property did indeed âbelongâ to others before we got here.
It doesnât any longer and why not?
Ok. So?
Weâre discussing game theory, are we not? If itâs in my best interest to involve the government, why shouldnât I?
Because it isnât in your best interest, as we can plainly see.
TheDoctorIsIn:How so?
Because you drag the public into the private.
Calling the rules of the game âpublicâ or âprivateâ is a category error.
Because it isnât in your best interest, as we can plainly see.
How so?
You have not shown that to be true at all.
Samson_Corwell:You think that you can use government to enforce debt obligation. I assume you also believe you can use government to award you damages for IP infringement.
I donât, Iâll handle it myself.
No you wonâtâŚlol.
Government force is not âfinalâ either.
And yesâŚthat property did indeed âbelongâ to others before we got here.
It doesnât any longer and why not?
Of course it is. Unless youâre counting the Good Lord.
No, it didnât.
WuWei: Samson_Corwell:You think that you can use government to enforce debt obligation. I assume you also believe you can use government to award you damages for IP infringement.
I donât, Iâll handle it myself.
No you wonâtâŚlol.
Oh yes I will.