Truth Social Launches Tomorrow

He continues to go back to a dry well.

So we have established that the government did not instruct Facebook to ban certain individuals. Good to jnow we can agree on that.

But now the argument is that Facebook were coerced by the government to ban individuals? In what way did they put the frighteners on Facebook?

Are we not grasping at straws to try and create a narrative that the government is trampling on free speech?

1 Like

Pretty much every other state with affirmative free speech rights has rejected Pruneyard as a standard.

California itself has narrowed the scope of Pruneyard over the years and came close to overturning it once. There are still test cases out there designed to do so.

But yep I was wrong…there are people willing to keep going back to that dry well…

Okay, Truth Social is doing super.

He quoted an article from LAST YEAR.

Lololol!

Just throwing out alternate mud.

That is more impressive.

Think about it.

No it’s not.

Situation has changed.

Obvious cash flow problems.
And the prediction of a $1T market cap was just that…a prediction.

Since this “bold prediction”, shares of DWAC are off by 52%.

In other words, its value has been cut in half.

And that’s with TS actually having launched.

Not in the way you are describing, our state rep often holds “roundtables” at local resturants though. Our federal, I don’t remember one making a local stop. Was basically saying town squares DO still exist.

Yea local pols here do similar things but the restaurant owner still has the right to refuse admission to someone. For example if I walk in, order a meal and then start heckling those talking to the politician I will be asked to leave and rightly so.

No the government didn’t instruct them to ban an actual individual in that instance, more a subject. But they did pressure twitter to ban Alex Berenson. Keep defending actual fascists

1 Like

Uh oh :neutral_face:

Trumplicans got scammed again by the grift. Who actually believed a former dairy farmer could run a tech company? :rofl:

This doesn’t sound good.

Wait how much does it cost to run this company? It cant be that much. Has Trump decided not to put any of his money into it himself?

https://www.salon.com/2022/08/28/truth-social-is-headed-for-bankruptcy_partner/

But he’s great at business!

"According to a report from the Washington Post, prospects that Donald Trump’s Truth Social will survive are growing bleak with the company that had planned to take the social media platform public now suggesting that a probable bankruptcy is on the horizon.

As the report points out, Truth Social has not been paying for web-hosting fees to the point where attorneys are now involved, traffic is collapsing, the value of stock in the company is plunging and money is running out.

With the Post reporting, “Former president Donald Trump’s Truth Social website is facing financial challenges as its traffic remains puny and the company that is scheduled to acquire it expresses fear that his legal troubles could lead to a decline in his popularity,” WaPo’s Drew Harwell wrote that the former president’s legal problems have added another cloud of Truth Social’s future."

Deep State, Government censorship, RINOs, Socialist Global Agenda, Soros , Clinton, Obama etc etc etc.

Should Truth Social fail the above will be the excuses trotted out because Trump being at fault or not a good businessman is unthinkable to his flock.

Maybe a dairy farmer wasn’t a good pick to run a tech company. Trump picks only the best people. :rofl:

2 Likes

Investors are walking away from commitments to invest in a company that planned to merge with Donald Trump’s Truth Social platform. “Blank-check” company Digital World Acquisition said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Friday that some backers were pulling a total of $139 million they had planned to put into the deal. Digital World had previously announced funding commitments of $1 billion.