I’m not sure who you’re conversing with in your head there, but I didn’t say any of that. I was very clear in the expression of my observation.
Is this bad news? Are you related to the guy? I’m not. It’s not bad news for me and I was pretty clear in my statement. Anyone who doesn’t know what my point was either isn’t trying or is gaslighting. Which one are you?
The people of the mueller av can’t allow any besmirching of their hero.
One, I think stretching the law to help pedophiles is bad, an opinion that derives from my dislike of pedophilia.
Two, this illustrates how the criminal justice system operates differently for the rich and powerful than for others and I dislike that.
Your argument appears to be that something cannot bad unless it has a personal impact. I find that a sense of empathy connects distant events to oneself. You are free to disagree with that.
And despite your continued deflection, I read your position correctly. You are besmirching people rather than engaging with the content of events and then denying disparaging people as the follow-up. This is the Roy Cohn/Donald Trump playbook. It’s very familiar, and, of course, both Cohn and Trump are posterchildren for the lack of empathy.
I also love this weird attempt to pin this on Mueller when he had nothing to do with putting the agreement together.
It is like some are refusing to learn how all of this works in the real world and are instead trying to cling to anything that disparages the guy who is going after their dumpster fire.
This is the case where Mueller was in charge for the FBI, right? And the globalist George W. Bush was president, right? Acosta was working for them, right?