Thanks for adding the stupid to the topic. Nicely done.
I can hear the strain of the pixels as they are stretched beyond their limits of support.
You think his board position was his primary position or was he also Hunter’s partner at the investment firm?
How absurd. The real investigation occurs in a black box controlled by the IC IG who has seen nothing and knows nothing first hand.
The trial is over and held in secret even before you know who has any knowledge of anything.
No, that is not the way it works. Would you accept as your legitimate accuser the person has third hand informaton and doesn’t tell you what evidence or testimony exists?
All of which is a derailment. The real question is factual…has Trump attempted to find out the name of the whistle blower. That is a yes or no. As of now, we have no evidence that he has attempted to find the name of the whistle blower.
Bile and blaspheme.
So sorry you cannot field a candidate who can beat the Orange marvel.
Impeach away.
That’s just the sound of your desperate logic.
Conflict of Interest.
Notso good for him.
More screeching.
How does logic become “desperate?”
That in of itself is illogical.
1 Like
The IG doesn’t have first hand knowledge? How do you figure?
A desperate human is at the center. English is hard.
Well, we cant really tell what he has. That is the nature of a black box.
That is not the nature of our judicial system, however.
You sure tried to though
Sure it is. A suspect is not privy to the evidence against them until their case goes to trial
The IG also doesn’t conduct a trial… He merely determines in the evidence is urgent and credible… that’s it
First, there is no “compromise” in being discussed in that conversation. He has stated that Guiliani didn’t even talk to him about this. Being mentioned in a conversation is not the same as being involved in a conversation.
Second, the DOJ OLC career professionals are the ones who made the decision about the whistle blower report. You have no evidence or reason to believe that Barr personally had anything to do with it.
The purpose of the investigation into the origins of the Russian investigation is to find out the truth about what happened and why it happened. An investigation that is making some very very nervous.
what do you think would happen if Trump was the whistle blower using hearsay to pull their finger?
Like the IG saying Comey should of been locked up for his actions and the DOJ decided other wise?
Where did the IG say that?
In front of Congress
