Trump Tower meeting Russian lawyer admits she was paid informant to the Kremlin

[MarkyS]

@CaughtInTheMiddle

That was my point. You sound just like a wife trying to protect her husband. You’re blaming everyone but the husband.

Your point is a sexist remark and OFF TOPIC. The topic is NOT me and what gender you think I sound like.

BRAVO!!

M

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@MarkyS

Your point is a sexist remark and OFF TOPIC.

No it’s not. You’re blaming everyone but the cheating husband. Just like a wife who’s trying to protect her husband.

[MarkyS]

Nice attempt to tap dance!

M

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@MarkyS

Nice attempt to tap dance!

I’m just describing what you’re doing.

[MarkyS]

You’re just trying to examine ME and not the topic and in the doing you basically made a sexist remark about women, in general.

If you want to discuss the TOPIC of the thread I’m your guy. If you want to try to insult and analyze me we are done.

AGAIN that sort of post bores the crap out of me.

M

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@MarkyS

You’re just trying to examine ME and not the topic and in the doing you basically made a sexist remark about women, in general.

Dude, you were talking about Stormy and how she is for sale.

Then I pointed out that women protecting their husbands would do something similar.

[MarkyS]

No. You made two speculations about ME - one of them a sexist remark about women.

Knock it off or stop bothering me.

M

[Vigilante]

@MarkyS

@Vigilante

Because he paid an idiotic sum and more than anyone else, in an attempt to hide it.

He has all the money he needs to get nuisances to go away. Wouldn’t it be nice if your hero Stormy could NOT try to extort more?

She’s not only a skank but she’s also an extortionist. That’s the pride of the anti-Trumpers for you!

M

And she is your baby. Deal with it. But to pay off a blackmailer, well! It would certainly seem unbecoming of a President to pay off a blackmailer.

[MarkyS]

Rich people pay off nuisances all the time. They can afford to just get rid of them instead of defend themselves. Sometimes they relish legally taking them apart instead. It just depends.

M

[Vigilante]

@MarkyS

Rich people pay off nuisances all the time. They can afford to just get rid of them instead of defend themselves. Sometimes they relish legally taking them apart instead. It just depends.

M

And she is your baby. Deal with it. But to pay off a blackmailer, well! It would certainly seem unbecoming of a President to pay off a blackmailer

[MarkyS]

You already said that and I already replied to you.

Put down the pipe.

M

[sikofit]

@MarkyS

Rich people pay off nuisances all the time. They can afford to just get rid of them instead of defend themselves. Sometimes they relish legally taking them apart instead. It just depends.

But that’s not the approach Trump claims to use when dealing with legal problems. He feels that settling with an offending party invites more of same

We have many, many people that will be witnesses. Again, I don’t settle cases. I don’t do it because that’s why I don’t get sued very often, because I don’t settle, unlike a lot of other people. - Donald Trump

[Vigilante]

Replied to what? Did I ask a question?

[sikofit]

@MarkyS

Put down the pipe.

I thought you never go personal?

[MarkyS]

You’re confusing a suit with a NDA.

M

[MarkyS]

@sikofit

I thought you never go personal?

I’m concerned for him.

M

[MarkyS]

@Vigilante

Replied to what? Did I ask a question?

You made the same statement TWICE and I already replied to it once.

M

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@MarkyS

No. You made two speculations about ME - one of them a sexist remark about women.

Knock it off or stop bothering me.

okay, all you have to do is stop acting like a wife who is protecting her husband after an affair. it’s not an insult, it’s simply a description of how some wives go about protecting their husbands after they have an affair and you are using the exact tactics that they sometimes use.

make sense now?

[madasheck]

@MarkyS

@sikofit

I thought you never go personal?

I’m concerned for him.

M

You should be. He’s in deep deep ■■■■■

[Vigilante]

@MarkyS

@Vigilante

Replied to what? Did I ask a question?

You made the same statement TWICE and I already replied to it once.

M

Your reply did not refute or negate the statement so there is nothing wrong with repeating it. I will state it again but this time in a form of a question. Paying $130,000.00 as blackmail for a blackmailing whore is unbecoming of a President wouldnt you agree? Thats your President and your Whore. Own it. Embrace them both.