Wow, and now throw in that Mueller was out to get Trump
He was doing the job he was tasked to do within the confines of established DOJ policy. Nothing more, nothing less.
Some CEC listeners have been told that because Mueller didnt indict a certain someone that this means they were innocent and didnt do something, but at the same time didnt conclusively rule it out.
While others look at it and say, sure not enough evidence to bring an indictment and especially given current DOJ policy it didnt happen. However that doesnt mean the house cant explore further if they choose to.
As has been pointed out numerous times. Not one person had a single bad thing to say about Mueller up until he was appointed special prosecutor. None on the left, none on the right.
Even now after delivering this report which was within every boundary of him as a special prosecutor, some choose to dismiss what was said in the report that wasnt absolutely a sparkling assessment of Trump as only because he was a snake out to get Trump.
Itâs not the law side of the story. Itâs Robert Muellerâs side of the story. William Barr is also the law and he and Rod Rosenstein - also the law - disagree withg Robert Mueller in a KEY way - they will not indict Trump or anyone else based on Robert Muellerâs side of the story.
When we find out how early on Robert Mueller knew that Trump was innocent of conspiracy then we will have to ask him what the hell he was trying to do for the last two years.
Because if he knew that Trump was innocent then he was trying the GET him on a process crime, instead.
NOT HIS JOB.
This whole âobstructionâ nonsense is exactly that and we can all see it.
Mueller was excoriated for the way he handled the anthrax case as head of the FBI, not only then but right when he was appointed Special Counsel. I know the LEFT and the never-Trumpers didnât want to see that but it was certainly there.
And, it was also pointed out that he was conflicted right from the start, because he had just been turned down by the President as the replacement for James Comey.
Who told you NO ONE had a problem with Robert Mueller?? I guess you have never seen the broadcasts of your host, because you somehow believe no one had a problem with Robert Mueller and Sean was AMONG those who did.
If you could read you would know that i said no one had a problem with Mueller up until the day he was appointed special prosecutor, including our host.
Sean has ALWAYS had a problem with Mueller for the way he conducted the anthrax scare and he spoke of it when Muellerâs name was first being kicked around for this job.
Really doesnt matter if it doesnt stop the investigation. The mere fact he tried is obstruction. You need to understand this. You need to understand the only that saved trump besides barr is the fsct he is president. Should trump lose in 2020 he will be indicted.
There is nothing you can say to stop this.
No amount of pivotsâŚno amount of caps. No amount of what your feelings think pf the matter. You defend a criminal and nothing more because he has an r next to his name. As we saw with hillary you wanted every stone overturned. No amount of money or stupid wild conspiracy was too much for you.
Why shouldnât the President down play the whole ordeal?
HE WAS INNOCENT and he knew it!
You keep talking about the whole ordeal like it was actually necessary. As it turns out, it wasnât at all necessary and was a colossal waste of time and money.
The DOJ should have had career prosecutors looking into the Russians and their role in the election only - easy for them to do. There was NO NEED for a Special Counsel, as Peter Strozk and Lisa Page could have told you before it started. They are the ones who said there was nothing there about Trump; that there wasnât a shred of evidence that Trump conspired with the Russians.
But, if you are going to have a Special Counsel, anyway, it SHOULD NOT be a guy who applied for a job but was turned down by the President, right after his friend was just FIRED by that president.
Those are two good reasons to see him as conflicted.
As it turns out the Mueller report goes out of its way NOT to mention the role played by the FBI in so many ways that tainted the whole thing, so Mueller showed his stripes, right there, among other ways.
What a load of â â â â â â â â â .asking macghan to lie is obstruction. Asking Lewandowski to get Mueller fired is obstructionâŚgetting well we have been over this numerous times. In the end you support and defend a criminal because of partisanship and nothing else.
Hannity had a problem with him as soon as he heard his name being kicked around. He was already mad that a special prosecutor was being considered. So then went looking for some stuff and decided to get outraged about it, not so much about the person but that an SP was going to be appointed.
Would you care to find for me some audio, video, written article about our host mentioning Mueller at any point between the anthrax situation and the point when Muellerâs name was first mentioned for the SP?
We will all wait.
It wouldnât have matter who they appointed, they would have called that person biased, and any other number of names because they never felt a SP should have been appointed in the first place.
So donât give me that garbage. Once again and itâs an undisputed fact, before this SP issue, Mueller was a distinguished military veteran and top notch lawyer that was respected by nearly everyone on both side of the isle which is why he worked as a US attorney under multiple administrations, and in the FBI under multiple administrations.
Now somehow that just gets washed away and heâs always been out to get Trump LOL
