Washington DC is and always should be just that, the District established in the Constitution for 200 years. Nothing has changed.
Because we don’t need another state. There is not purpose in it.
Because we don’t need another state. There is not purpose in it.
They’re already citizens. Have been for an hundred years. Why don’t they count? They want statehood too.
TommyLucchese: DougBH:No. I said Democrats only care because of partisan politics
Right and you oppose statehood because. . .?
Because we don’t need another state. There is not purpose in it.
It isn’t about what the “we” needs… it is about what is best for citizens of the United States who live without proper federal representation.
The right hates Mexico Island.
So you don’t care about taxation without representation?
Either make them a state, or don’t force the residence to pay federal income tax.
Hmm, I wonder why?
So you don’t care about taxation without representation?
Either make them a state, or don’t force the residence to pay federal income tax.
If they were a State they could have representation to address how the Jones Act is a drain on their economy.
We dont “need” lots of things. Sometimes we do things because its the right thing to do.
So you don’t care about taxation without representation?
Either make them a state, or don’t force the residence to pay federal income tax.
That’s part of “cutting them loose”.
smh…okay.
pathetic.
You’re a trader, would you buy Puerto Rico?
discounted, yes.
Full price, no.
Allan
That’s part of “cutting them loose”.
so what do you you do with citizens of the United States who live in PR?
just cut them off from their rights under the constitution.
“Letting them go” is a sticky wicket.
Allan
Trump an "absolute no" on Puerto Rico statehood, citing feud with mayor - CBS News
yeah, he’s having a spat so he has to lash out. dude is a child.
“With the mayor of San Juan as bad as she is and as incompetent as she is, Puerto Rico shouldn’t be talking about statehood until they get some people that really know what they’re doing,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with Rivera’s show on Cleveland’s WTAM radio.
When “you have good leadership,” statehood for Puerto Rico could be “something they talk about,” Mr. Trump said. “With people like that involved in Puerto Rico, I would be an absolute no.”
so, if you guys ever want anything, don’t cross the king.
What an ever loving jackass we Americans have elected to the oval office.
That’s part of “cutting them loose”.
So much for America first.
Washington DC is and always should be just that, the District established in the Constitution for 200 years. Nothing has changed.
well thats not true, DC has 3 electoral votes in a presidential election. The amendment changed things, right?
Allan
DougBH:We don’t need another state. Cut them loose.
I’m not sure what you mean by “cut them loose”. P.R. is an island, inhabited by US citizens. What would “cutting them loose” do to those Americans?
When one is a Trumplican, like they are, thinking doesn’t enter the picture, certainly thinking about the people of Puerto Rico wouldn’t enter in, they can’t vote for Fat Donald, they don’t really count.
DougBH:That’s part of “cutting them loose”.
So much for America first.
well, they’re not “really” americans. have you seen them?
Guess no one told President small hands it isn’t his say on the matter. Who woulda thunk the moron in chief wouldn’t know this and that apparently no one around him told him either.
Facts and reality are of no concern to Mr. Alternative Facts aka Truth isn’t Truth.
I know.
It was a complete travesty how it happened as well. American imperialism at its worst in Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Cuba.
Personally I support statehood. But either way the status quo is just wrong.