Sorry Doc. You are making an assumption. That is not my intent at all. If you are a real doc you should not be making amateur assumptions. If you want to know what I am seeking. You may ask. I have never held back before. Wanna try again?
Try this. Try not focusing on my posting habits. Try focusing on the topic. I have a little trick that works great for me. Unless it is absolutely necessary to the conversation avoid using the word “you.” Always be the last one, not the first one to judge the motivations of the person. If personal crap starts, make sure you are not the one who starts it. Do I screw this up from time to time? Of course. But it helps me stay within the forum guide line of discussing topics, not people.
This is your thread on toxic masculinity, is it not?
You have repeatedly claimed that you see the term as an insult, an accusation, a way to divide people and judge people according to gender, have you not?
I am discussing your topic - specifically, the fact that you don’t understand what the term means. It’s not an insult, or a way to judge anyone. It’s not a label.
“Toxic masculinity” is a description of a set of thoughts - not a person, or a gender.
What is the feminine version of toxic masculinity? And who gets to decide what makes a thought masculine or feminine? Remember the Duke Lacrosse case? Would that be an example of toxic femininity? What about the Kavanaugh accusers who were verified as lying?
No. Because self destructive behavior is not what they mean when they talk of toxic masculinity. So what would be the feminine version? And why are we not naming it?
There’s no need to be so defensive. No one is attacking you.
I’d say that severe body image issues, such as anorexia and bulimia would qualify as “toxic femininity” - but this isn’t about an equivalence. Identifying toxic ideas of masculinity is not attacking all men.
The Duke Lacrosse case, and the Kavanaugh issues are about lies, not “femininity”.
Yes, actually that’s exactly what “toxic masculinity” means. It is self-destructive behavior - as well as behavior destructive to others (as are body issues).
Why do you think there has to be a one-to-one equivalence?
So they do it because they are concerned about the welfare of men and want to help them? Nice spin! I like! Y’all need to do a better job of promoting it this way. Maybe people will starl appreciating being labeled as toxic.
Oh, and one more thing. Anorexia is not the feminine version of toxic masculinity. That was invented here in this forum. Nobody calls someone who is struggling with anorexia a toxic person. What is the feminine version?