It’s ■■■■■■■ hilarious.
Can they call Hillary? I think they need to.
Lolololol
Back to business? The Senate hasn’t done anything this session. They will probably take more votes during impeachment than they will take for their entire session.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
It’s looking more likely that senate is going to end this charade…maybe even have couple democrats going along as well.
I say good. The senate has other pressing problem it needs to do.
The senate needs to be adults here and end this charade. It’s time to move on and tackle real corruption and problems we face.
Time to end democrats silly little temper tantrum now.
I agree. As soon as it was noted that no high crimes or misdemeanors were in the articles, the Turtle should have held an up or down vote to dismiss.
On the other hand, that may have led to Impeachment Two in the House. Maybe its better that Trump get a full throated “Not Guilty” and the Dems are made to look like fools.
I am of two minds here.
Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
You do realize that the Senate is the jury, right?
Imagine if you were on trial for murder and the DA failed to make his case, and then he told the jury, Hey, go find some more witnesses and evidence for me, will ya?
Thats what your asking. Hellooooooo
Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is plenty of new evidence.
Bolton claims the President told him aid was conditioned on investigations. It is in his book. That is new evidence.
Lev Parnas published a recording of the President telling someone to “take her out”. That is evidence.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the President directed the aid to be frozen.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the freeze was requested 90 minutes after the phone call with Zelensky.
“Enough talk Bring it on”
“The panic, the fear, the desperation is setting in”
Why don’t you want witness to testify?
©
Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is always new evidence coming.
thinkingman: Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is plenty of new evidence.
Bolton claims the President told him aid was conditioned on investigations. It is in his book. That is new evidence.
Lev Parnas published a recording of the President telling someone to “take her out”. That is evidence.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the President directed the aid to be frozen.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the freeze was requested 90 minutes after the phone call with Zelensky.
bolton’s book is a joke and contains nothing impeachable
Parnas is in an ankle monitor. please
the emails if true dont change anything
how pathetically desperate
kingarthur65: thinkingman: Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is plenty of new evidence.
Bolton claims the President told him aid was conditioned on investigations. It is in his book. That is new evidence.
Lev Parnas published a recording of the President telling someone to “take her out”. That is evidence.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the President directed the aid to be frozen.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the freeze was requested 90 minutes after the phone call with Zelensky.bolton’s book is a joke and contains nothing impeachable
Parnas is in an ankle monitor. please
the emails if true dont change anything
how pathetically desperate
How do you know that Bolton’s book is a joke?
Imagine if you were on trial for murder and the DA failed to make his case, and then he told the jury, Hey, go find some more witnesses and evidence for me, will ya?
Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial.
Also the prosecution is not asking the jury to find witnesses. They arw juat asking that they hear what the witnesses have to say
thinkingman: Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is always new evidence coming.
too late
TrumpGurl:Imagine if you were on trial for murder and the DA failed to make his case, and then he told the jury, Hey, go find some more witnesses and evidence for me, will ya?
Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial
Imagine this…new evidence suddenly coming up that shows that trump is quite innocent. Sorry…no new evidence allowed, folks.
thinkingman: kingarthur65: thinkingman: Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is plenty of new evidence.
Bolton claims the President told him aid was conditioned on investigations. It is in his book. That is new evidence.
Lev Parnas published a recording of the President telling someone to “take her out”. That is evidence.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the President directed the aid to be frozen.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the freeze was requested 90 minutes after the phone call with Zelensky.bolton’s book is a joke and contains nothing impeachable
Parnas is in an ankle monitor. please
the emails if true dont change anything
how pathetically desperate
How do you know that Bolton’s book is a joke?
because he is
remember how you used to hate him?
Bodecea: thinkingman: Bodecea: thinkingman: AmusedObserver: thinkingman: SeaManatee:Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.
house didnt get enough?
hmmm. and yet they impeached
It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?
i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand
which there is none.
So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.
there is no new evidence.
house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work
There is always new evidence coming.
too late
No its not. What precedent or rule are you basing that on?
kingarthur65:There is plenty of new evidence.
Oh well. So what.
Do people realize that the Senate is the jury?
Imagine if you were in trial for murder and the DA failed to make his case, and then he told the jury, Hey, go find some more witnesses and evidence for me, will ya?
Thats what is happening. Hellooooooo
I realize that. Do they? Do you understand the responsibility of the Senators/Jury in this case?
I’m good with it either way. New evidence will be presented to the public for months to come. I think that works out even better for the Dems. It would be in the GOP best interest to combat this now, rather than have to deal with the new information that is bound to come out.