Time to end this charade

[TrumpGurl]

@sikofit

Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial.

Also the prosecution is not asking the jury to find witnesses. They arw juat asking that they hear what the witnesses have to say

Do you understand the purpose of Due Process? It protects innocent people. The Left just wants to pee on it. No thank you.

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

remember how you used to hate him?

I still do. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t hear what he knows

[Bodecea]

@thinkingman

@Bodecea

@thinkingman

@kingarthur65

@thinkingman

@Bodecea

@thinkingman

@AmusedObserver

@thinkingman

@SeaManatee

Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.

house didnt get enough?

hmmm. and yet they impeached

It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?

i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand

which there is none.

So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.

there is no new evidence.

house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work

There is plenty of new evidence.
Bolton claims the President told him aid was conditioned on investigations. It is in his book. That is new evidence.
Lev Parnas published a recording of the President telling someone to “take her out”. That is evidence.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the President directed the aid to be frozen.
Emails obtained through FOIA show that the freeze was requested 90 minutes after the phone call with Zelensky.

bolton’s book is a joke and contains nothing impeachable

Parnas is in an ankle monitor. please

the emails if true dont change anything

how pathetically desperate

How do you know that Bolton’s book is a joke?

because he is

remember how you used to hate him?

I’m surprised you believe Bolton is a joke. How come he’s been such a key member of several administrations including being our UN representative if he is a joke? Can you give us a little more substantial reason besides “he just is”?

And I neither hate nor like him. I disagree with much of his government policy. That doesn’t translate to “hate”…at least, it shouldn’t.

[sikofit]

@TrumpGurl

Do you understand the purpose of Due Process

Apparently a lot better than you do. There was no violation of due process at any stage

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@thinkingman

@Bodecea

@thinkingman

@Bodecea

@thinkingman

@AmusedObserver

@thinkingman

@SeaManatee

Senate, if you’re listening, could you please call witnesses so we can get more information? And the media will thank you for it.

house didnt get enough?

hmmm. and yet they impeached

It was enough, and yet there’s new evidence since the impeachment. You want the Senate to consider all evidence when making such a momentous decision, don’t you?

i want everyone to consider the evidence at hand

which there is none.

So, ignore any new evidence that appears? Interesting.

there is no new evidence.

house managers want a mulligan because their stupid lawfare approach didnt work

There is always new evidence coming.

too late

No its not. What precedent or rule are you basing that on?

the house articles are based on the evidence avail at the time (of which there is none)

they had their chance

[kingarthur65]

@TrumpGurl

@sikofit

Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial.

Also the prosecution is not asking the jury to find witnesses. They arw juat asking that they hear what the witnesses have to say

Do you understand the purpose of Due Process? It protects innocent people. The Left just wants to pee on it. No thank you.

Due process? What due process is violated by hearing from hearing relevant testimony?

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

the house articles are based on the evidence avail at the time (of which there is none)

Then you should have no problem showing where the rules for impeachment says that the only evidence allowed is the evidence within the House articles

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@thinkingman

remember how you used to hate him?

I still do. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t hear what he knows

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

but since he now may stroke the dems stupid narrative you run him up a flagpole

[sikofit]

@kingarthur65

@TrumpGurl

@sikofit

Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial.

Also the prosecution is not asking the jury to find witnesses. They arw juat asking that they hear what the witnesses have to say

Do you understand the purpose of Due Process? It protects innocent people. The Left just wants to pee on it. No thank you.

Due process? What due process is violated by hearing from hearing relevant testimony?

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@thinkingman

the house articles are based on the evidence avail at the time (of which there is none)

Then you should have no problem showing where the rules for impeachment says that the only evidence allowed is the evidence within the House articles

you should have no problem with that either

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

Wrong. I hate him for his warmonger tendencies. It has nothing to do with his credibility

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@thinkingman

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

Wrong. I hate him for his warmonger tendencies. It has nothing to do with his credibility

right you believe everything he says. lol

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

@sikofit

@thinkingman

the house articles are based on the evidence avail at the time (of which there is none)

Then you should have no problem showing where the rules for impeachment says that the only evidence allowed is the evidence within the House articles

you should have no problem with that either

Major fail. One can’t show what does not exist.

Its your assertion, try backing it up if you can

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

@sikofit

@thinkingman

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

Wrong. I hate him for his warmonger tendencies. It has nothing to do with his credibility

right you believe everything he says. lol

Now you’re just flailing. It’s kind of sad

[TrumpGurl]

@sikofit

Apparently a lot better than you do. There was no violation of due process at any stage

FALSE!
That is such a not true statement that I am busting at the seams to say what it really is.

I cannot speak to you anymore if you are will to just make things up.

Democrats' partisan impeachment violates the US Constitution

[Bodecea]

@TrumpGurl

@sikofit

Imagine if a family member was murdered and at the trial the defense tried to bar any evidence attained after the indictment was issued from being admitted into the trial.

Also the prosecution is not asking the jury to find witnesses. They arw juat asking that they hear what the witnesses have to say

Do you understand the purpose of Due Process? It protects innocent people. The Left just wants to pee on it. No thank you.

Where is Due Process not being followed here?

[TrumpGurl]

@sikofit

Due process? What due process is violated by hearing from hearing relevant testimony?

I give up. I am surrounded by… …nevermind.

[Bodecea]

@thinkingman

@sikofit

@thinkingman

remember how you used to hate him?

I still do. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t hear what he knows

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

but since he now may stroke the dems stupid narrative you run him up a flagpole

Where does hating someone automatically mean they are not credible?

[sikofit]

@TrumpGurl

@sikofit

Apparently a lot better than you do. There was no violation of due process at any stage

FALSE!
That is such a not true statement that I am busting at the seams to say what it really is.

I cannot speak to you anymore if you are will to just make things up.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/democrats-partisan-impeachment-violates-the-us-constitution

Didn’t you just laugh at using opinion pieces

[Bodecea]

@thinkingman

@sikofit

@thinkingman

yes it does because you hate him because he is not credible

Wrong. I hate him for his warmonger tendencies. It has nothing to do with his credibility

right you believe everything he says. lol

How has said that they believe everything Bolton says? He should testify under oath. No one has any preconceived notions…except for those terrified of him testifying. That’s telling.