I’m looking.
Not really. It’s right there.
What exactly does “advisor to POTUS” mean?
Can she do whatever she wants by being “advisor to POTUS”?
Can she use her personal e-mail to conduct WH business?
Where?
Whatever the POTUS wants it to.
Odd, I don’t recall the outrage when another government official (AOC) called for the boycott.
weird huh?
Issues like this have already gone to SCOTUS. 1st amendment rules. Nothing illegal.
Who does the POTUS work for?
The people who elected him.
which agency is it again that employs her?
And who would that be?
Mostly republicans. Some democrats.
It doesn’t matter. Nothing does.
1 Like
I know. It’s 5th Ave syndrome.
Truth matters.
She doesn’t have to get paid by Goya for it to be breaking the law.
She does have to use her position.
She might have left it off her twitter profile then. Better yet, she could not be on twitter at all. Seems weird that government officials who aren’t allowed to “suggest that the agency or any part of the executive branch endorses an organization (including a nonprofit organization), product, service, or person.” would be perfectly ok using social media which is solely funded by ADVERTISING. But here we are.
Meh.
5 chars
Then there’s this…a POTUS wife hocking a whole lot of Goya food compared to a POTUS daughter holding up one can. 
Click on image below:
