I have addressed it. I have attempted to have a decent conversation about it.
I have tried to inject my opinion about what it means taking the lessons of 2016 and what the future may hold.
But ignore it…
C’mon. If there is a point to be made actually make one instead of throwing out a post and when people take the time to respond to you you have a completely separate conversation that has nothing to do with what people are talking about.
We all had heard the Trump was losing support among women…and Trump women problem put out by left-wing media…but yet last quarter 45 percent who had donation 200 or more is 45 percent…which beat Obama total for 2012 election by 1 percent.
Are we going to go into percentages or raw numbers?
It seems that switching between the two happens when it is convenient to the argument.
It makes sense that among people who donate to either party, there is near parity between the sexes… especially when all amounts of money are taken onto consideration… something that the Romney figure did not keep track of.
The article you posted said “over 44%”, which is at least 45. But keep ignoring that, and the fact that trump getting donations from Republican women before a democratic candidate has even been chosen is somehow indicative that trump is getting a tidal wave of women’s support. He isn’t.
His disapproval rating with women overall hovers in the mid-60s.
I have a fundamental problem not only with the source of the “news” but also that Trump’s donations is given in terms of money and the top two Democrats is given as a percentage. A case of origins compared with oranges perhaps.