Things are starting to smell fishy with the impeachment inquiry

[SixFoot]

@Dem

You’re pretty good at this.

Agreed. This @calirepub’s material is improving dramatically. lol

[Camp]

Pelosi rushed in before she had the appropriate probable cause.

She looks rather foolish right now.

A vote would justify her action.

[party-free]

She doesn’t need a vote to investigate. That is not required.

If Trump has nothing to hide and the call was perfect then they should not have any problem letting officials testify and releasing any documentation requested on the matter so that we can clear him as quickly as possible. Don’t you agree?

[STODR]

then she should also have no problem with the GOP members calling witnesses to interview correct?

[JayJay]

@Bill.in.PA

Many Democrats are claiming that they need to impeach Trump to save the rule of law and the constitution.

If the whistleblower(s) illegally leaked information to congress and/or the press before filing a complaint, does that mean that the impeachment investigation is violating the rule of law and constitutional rights to due process?

Are the Democrats destroying what they are claiming to be defending in their zeal to get Trump?

Good thing the whistleblowers did nothing of the sort.

[biggestal99]

1. No

2. No

3. Unknown as the whistleblowers Id is unknown.

Allan

[gooddad409]

@Bill.in.PA

Recent reports raise troubling questions about the origin of the allegations that form the basis of the House impeachment inquiry. Here are three examples:

1. Rules were changed that allowed whistleblower complaints based on second-hand information:
   ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions

2. The Democrats very quickly moved to start an impeachment inquiry even before any real investigation, and Schiff may have had the complaint before it was filed:
   Adam Schiff knew of complaint before whistleblower filed it | Washington Examiner

3. The two whistleblowers appear to have political biases against Trump:
   Former CIA officer questions whether second whistleblower also has political bias | Fox News

Are Democrats and their supporters in the intelligence community and the state department ignoring any pretense of due process and rule of law in order to push through the impeachment?

Are the new allegations part of the “insurance policy” that FBI agent Strzok discussed to handle the unlikely event that Trump was elected?

Starting to smell fishy?? It has been smelling fishy and in fact is a continued attempt at a Coup.

An attempt to remove a president because they didn’t like the election results.

Banana Republic stuff.

[biggestal99]

@gooddad409

Starting to smell fishy?? It has been smelling fishy and in fact is a continued attempt at a Coup.

An attempt to remove a president because they didn’t like the election results.

Banana Republic stuff.

No, impeachment is completely constitutional process to remove federal officers.

You don’t think trump is guilty and should be removed we get that.

But impeachment is how you remove federal officials.

And it’s in the constitution.

The house has sole power in the impeachment process.

Read the constitution, whydontcha.

Allan

[Camp]

You have the very fist standard that has not been met.

Probable cause.

Let us know when you get there with some sort of evidence.

[biggestal99]

@Camp

You have the very fist standard that has not been met.

Probable cause.

Let us know when you get there with some sort of evidence.

Probable cause in an impeachment case. Lol. It’s a political process.

No cause is needed. Probable or otherwise. Just articles of impeachment.

Allan

[sikofit]

@Plasmaball

Neat…its hearsay…there is nothing you can do about it…

Who knows more about law? Actual federal prosecutors or you?

Guess who I’m going with?

Who knows more or who thinks they know more?

[sikofit]

@Camp

Instead it is more fishing for cause and outrageous innuendo with no connection to any charge.

ADDITIONALLY…the conduct of Hunter Biden and most likely VP Joe Biden is heavy with evidence of corruption and payoff.

Most likely? That’s called a fishing expedition which you just claimed to be against

[Plasmaball]

We know answer to that…there can only be one

[sikofit]

@Camp

ADDITIONALLY…the conduct of Hunter Biden and most likely VP Joe Biden is heavy with evidence of corruption and payoff.

Can you please lay out some of that heavy evidence of corruption and payoff?

[gooddad409]

BS. This is a 3 year fishing expedition in search of a crime just because the left got their little feeeelings hurt in 2016.

It is banana republic stuff. Get ready for 5 more years of our successful president.

[party-free]

I recommend they get their ranking member on the Judiciary Committee on the matter, stat!

[biggestal99]

@gooddad409

BS. This is a 3 year fishing expedition in search of a crime just because the left got their little feeeelings hurt in 2016.

It is banana republic stuff. Get ready for 5 more years of our successful president

Not bs. But a true constitutional impeachment from the house.

Book it Danno.

Now the senate trial is also a done deal.

Not removed.

It’s just a political play. Everyone has to play their part.

Allan

[BlueTex]

@Camp

Pelosi rushed in before she had the appropriate probable cause.

She looks rather foolish right now.

A vote would justify her action.

LOL… Is Trump going to try to overturn any impeachment proceedings because they lacked “probable cause”?

[biggestal99]

@sikofit

Can you please lay out some of that heavy evidence of corruption and payoff?

Giuliani already has, you gotta keep up.

Allan

[biggestal99]

@BlueTex

LOL… Is Trump going to try to overturn any impeachment proceedings because they lacked “probable cause”?

SCOTUS justices (even silent Clarence) will get a big laugh out of that one.

The house is the sole arbiter of the impeachment process.

Allan