Although Friar Mendal has forbade us to consider “roll back” as a positive solution, I think that for a NATIONAL candidate, a policy statement that I would support is removal of policies and laws and regulations that the constitution says are the states’ domain. I think the way it is done and the time table for doing it is where the genius would come in.
3 Likes
big govt is still big govt. Whether at state or federal level.
You can not say this enough. A less intrusive government would be my number one.
1 Like
1803? 1790? 1866?
1 Like
I have no problem with health care as it is.
I have no problem with colleges as they are.
I have no problem with the police as they are.
You think it’s all broke, that’s you, not me.
Republicans are the lesser of two evils. But all of the above is working just fine for me and mine.
Since you are neither green nor yellow pea, you don’t get it.
You are dreaming a dream that hasn’t been possible since the ratification of the 14th in 1868. You and the GOP are stuck in a paradigm that doesn’t exist.
And you aren’t listening to The People.
If the GOP is going to “rollback”, they’ve got to say how, not just create a void.
1 Like
True and false. There are major differences.
I do.
Most do.
It’s a police state.
It is most definitely broken.
Then why are republicans just “the lesser of two evils”?
Every problem created by the federal government was created at its own particular time. Furthermore, a “rollback” has to be done in the context of the remaining and existing sociopolitical environment. So one would not pick the date that the federal government started its goatrope fiasco and say “let’s go back to that date”. No. Rolling back the damage that the federal government created is not that simple.
Presumably, a problem existed ( or was perceived to exist) that needed solved. The misguided people at the time relied on the federal government to solve it. Rolling back without empowering and preparing state/local to solve the problem is not the answer.
Look … surely you know this.
I do know it. Glad we could agree. How are you going to do that?
Fair. Can you give me a top line example or two?
What did the Great Rollerbacker actually manage to rollback? Objectively?
Oh… let me call a brainstorming session with my staff tonight and maybe I’ll have a position paper on it tomorrow.
Geeeze!
Cop out. You are describing dreams, not policies. The world is a different place every day. This generation is not that generation. These problems aren’t those problems.
For example: how do you make the current employer-tied healthcare system mobile for the incoming hustle economy?
It’s easy as hell triggering libs…and most American people love it.
1 Like
What is the republican vision for the US for the next 10 years?
1 Like
Doesn’t matter to me so long as it opposes the Marxist/socialist policies of the left. And that’s even if the Republican platform smells like socialism-lite. We have an enemy at the gates and you are wondering what the defenders are offering for dinner today.
Trump Doctrine.
Less tax.
More liberty…think small business as well as personal…go after censorship.
He didn’t go far enough…I would have gut the ■■■■ FBI, CIA, IRS and totally disband ATF.
Then start going through each and every department and starve em out.
And that is how you lose an election. You are voting for a draw.
