Rollback to what? 1950? What do you want to rollback to?
I can’t find a thing here to disagree with.
JayJay:No they don’t.
Party over country. Nice.
He’s right. Until Trump let’s go of the party, they don’t have to be for anything other than trolling libs to get elected.
WuWei: JayJay:No they don’t.
Party over country. Nice.
He’s right. Until Trump let’s go of the party, they don’t have to be for anything other than trolling libs to get elected.
That’s already not true. Trump already lost.
The GOP has been losing for quite a while. Trump was like a defibrillator.
DisturbedGuy: WuWei: JayJay:No they don’t.
Party over country. Nice.
He’s right. Until Trump let’s go of the party, they don’t have to be for anything other than trolling libs to get elected.
That’s already not true. Trump already lost.
True but the entire party is still afraid of him and his supporters.
True but the entire party is still afraid of him and his supporters.
Trump lost the Senate and House too. What are they afraid of?
DisturbedGuy:True but the entire party is still afraid of him and his supporters.
Trump lost the Senate and House too. What are they afraid of?
I think this past election was an anomaly because of the pandemic. I don’t disagree with you. We have to do something differently or we © will continue to fall behind.
I wasn’t making a value judgement…simply stating what is.
WuWei: DisturbedGuy: WuWei: JayJay:No they don’t.
Party over country. Nice.
He’s right. Until Trump let’s go of the party, they don’t have to be for anything other than trolling libs to get elected.
That’s already not true. Trump already lost.
True but the entire party is still afraid of him and his supporters.
I don’t think that is as true as it used to be.
I think it was a huge mistake not issuing a platform in the last election.
I think it was a huge mistake not issuing a platform in the last election.
I don’t.
What good is it until they have a vision?
Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael:You are making no sense. The federal government is not to be the solution for the things you mentioned.
Why not, the central government created every one of those problems.
It’s going to be “the dem solution”.
If so, then “rollback” would be a solution.
Rollback to what? 1950? What do you want to rollback to?
Roll back to before whatever the central government did to create the problem.
WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael:You are making no sense. The federal government is not to be the solution for the things you mentioned.
Why not, the central government created every one of those problems.
It’s going to be “the dem solution”.
If so, then “rollback” would be a solution.
Rollback to what? 1950? What do you want to rollback to?
Roll back to before whatever the central government did to create the problem.
It’s empty bromides like this that are your/their problem.
It seems today’s Republicans only stand for tax cuts for the rich, benefit cuts for the poor and TRIGGER THE LIBS!
How about some real policies that address real problems.
Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael:You are making no sense. The federal government is not to be the solution for the things you mentioned.
Why not, the central government created every one of those problems.
It’s going to be “the dem solution”.
If so, then “rollback” would be a solution.
Rollback to what? 1950? What do you want to rollback to?
Roll back to before whatever the central government did to create the problem.
It’s empty bromides like this that are your/their problem.
Empty. Less is more. I’m OK with that. Let states solve the problems
WuWei:Dems suck” is not a policy. Name three positive programs the GOP is for. Not rollbacks.
You want a party that is looking for smaller government to create three more new government programs?
What has the GOP done to institute “smaller government”?
Abbott just made govt smaller by ending women reproductive rights in Texas.
Desantis just made govt smaller by forbidding companies to set up vax mandate for private corporations.
It’s like they are really not for smaller govt.
Supreme_War_Pig: Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael: WuWei: Call_me_Ishmael:You are making no sense. The federal government is not to be the solution for the things you mentioned.
Why not, the central government created every one of those problems.
It’s going to be “the dem solution”.
If so, then “rollback” would be a solution.
Rollback to what? 1950? What do you want to rollback to?
Roll back to before whatever the central government did to create the problem.
It’s empty bromides like this that are your/their problem.
Empty. Less is more. I’m OK with that. Let states solve the problems
I get that. But given it is a national policy statement for a national candidate…
Yes. A rollback of bad programs is a great program. And “leave it to the people in the states” is an excellent policy for most issues (as Biden belatedly is beginning to believe.
On matters that the Feds have responsibility, like defending the integrity of our borders, the last administration was doing very well.
The GOP is not looking for smaller government.
Truth, given today’s GOP. (Specifically, the Establishment GOP, which is still far and away the largest component of the GOP.)
For people in those states and the state parties to decide locally.