and maybe you think they are “face planting” because of over-whelming bias in the media you soak up not to mention, credibly, see in search results
Yes and the issue remains that it is the popularity of the negative content that drives the results
I think that Ford is credible.
…and that’s based on evidence or “feelings”?
Yes and the issue remains that it is the popularity of the negative content that drives the results
from what we just learned from the article in the OP, that is in question.
No, I see them face-planting because they have terrible ideas and most Republican lawmakers are ■■■■■■ people. The rest flows from those two points.
No, I see them face-planting because they have terrible ideas and most Republican lawmakers are ■■■■■■ people. The rest flows from those two points.
thanks for your opinion tinged with partisan hate
Snowflakes can use conservapedia. Safe haven for all things glorious to Trump and Fox News
Hate?
No. Not hate. Objective observation. Try it sometime!
Jezcoe: thinkingman: Keyser_Soze:Can you provide some examples?
search results for trump, GOP are overwhelmingly negative. try it
Maybe it is because the administration and the party are face planting at every single turn.
Maybe it is after years of saying that the government sucks they get into power and prove the case.
and maybe you think they are “face planting” because of over-whelming bias in the media you soak up not to mention, credibly, see in search results
Nope… it is because they are faceplanting at every turn.
Who ever argued that it was impossible for Google to manipulate search results? They control the secret sauce, of course they have the ability to…
Hate?
No. Not hate. Objective observation. Try it sometime!
lol yeah no hate. ■■■■■■■ people”
how objective
Who ever argued that it was impossible for Google to manipulate search results? They control the secret sauce, of course they have the ability to…
haha…
everyone, everytime, with pure derision everytime it was observed and mentioned
cute
When conservatives type in “trump lies”, they expect google to come back with “ no results found”.
No, I see them face-planting because they have terrible ideas and most Republican lawmakers are ■■■■■■ people. The rest flows from those two points.
It is so crazy that someone like Wilbur Ross can get away with offshoring millions of dollars, something that would bring anyone else down… but that guy gets to keep his job.
If the CEC would at least be consistent with their outrage I would respect them more.
Objective face planting is a thing.
When conservatives type in “trump lies”, they expect google to come back with “ no results found”.
no but cnn articles about trump lying shouldnt appear at the top when searching for “trump news” lol
No it is not in question because we know google can change results as part of their business model. The question is whether they actually do it for political reasons and so far we have something that didn’t go down and with which i still have a problem on a personal level. And no there should be no laws about it
adroit:Who ever argued that it was impossible for Google to manipulate search results? They control the secret sauce, of course they have the ability to…
haha…
everyone, everytime, with pure derision everytime it was observed and mentioned
cute
No, seriously, who did? Name someone, anyone. Or is this one of those things that feels true to you?
NuffSaid:When conservatives type in “trump lies”, they expect google to come back with “ no results found”.
no but cnn articles about trump lying shouldnt appear at the top when searching for “trump news” lol
But what if those are the most popular links? And the algorithm weighs that heavily? Jesus y’all are confused.
Here is the thread:
My wife puts people on the first page of Google, professionally. That’s her job. You know how? Tons and tons and tons of legwork, algorithms, custom software and TIME and EFFORT and KNOWLEDGE. Money has nothing to do with it.
The dericiosion was specifically due to a lack of understanding of the op how seo works. It is still a problem in this thread