So another post calling me a liar.
Really really strange. Libs here get all offended with such personal attacks.
Talking about the so called “personal attacks” because someone doesn’t agree with your point.
So another post calling me a liar.
Really really strange. Libs here get all offended with such personal attacks.
Talking about the so called “personal attacks” because someone doesn’t agree with your point.
who cares.
…until it works against them?
Well that is a big nothing-burger, try again. It clearly states Google has never manipulated its search results .
You can use any search engine you want if you are still concerned.
If they did, is it wrong? Should there be laws against it?
Cynic:Well that is a big nothing-burger, try again. It clearly states Google has never manipulated its search results .
You can use any search engine you want if you are still concerned.
If they did, is it wrong? Should there be laws against it?
Nope.
10char
Nope.
I disagree.
I[quote=“Smyrna, post:55, topic:13327, full:true”]
Nope.
I disagree.
[/quote]
You are welcome to do that.
Use Bing if you don’t like Google’s search results.
You are welcome to do that.
Use Bing if you don’t like Google’s search results.
It’s a whole new arena that should have some standardized rules of fairness that apply to all equally.
CanadianJudo:who cares.
Apparently the liberals in this forum who were pontificating about how stupid Trumpettes didn’t understand that search algorithms were totally neutral as if they had been handed down by God.
right. and this vindicates claims made often in this forum about how the searches were biased.
Talk about small government conservatism!
Moar regulations!
Can you provide some examples?
Can you provide some examples?
search results for trump, GOP are overwhelmingly negative. try it
Perhaps it is the GOP’s bad policies that are the source of your concern?
Or their general ineptness to lead?
Republican voters believe that Trump is wildly popular and Democrats have no chance of taking the House. That could keep them at home this November.
Jezcoe:You are welcome to do that.
Use Bing if you don’t like Google’s search results.
It’s a whole new arena that should have some standardized rules of fairness that apply to all equally.
Why?
This is the crazy thing about the CEC anti intellectual contagion… free market is the greatest unless they feel that they are the ones getting the short end of the stick. There doesn’t have to be any proof… just the feeling.
If someone of a liberal persuasion makes that argument about say maybe the tax code or the regulatory structure… they are painted as anti free market socialist scum.
At least have some consistency.
Keyser_Soze:Can you provide some examples?
search results for trump, GOP are overwhelmingly negative. try it
Maybe it is because the administration and the party are face planting at every single turn.
Maybe it is after years of saying that the government sucks they get into power and prove the case.
Talk about small government conservatism!
Moar regulations!
Every law is due to an ass and there’s plenty of them.
That’s because the negative content is popular.
I have a problem with google doing what is described in the op on a personal level but they “promote” content all the time based on machine learning and ads. You guys just don’t like the result
You lost your conservative card. It’s that simole
There doesn’t have to be any proof… just the feeling.
So you agree that Kavanaugh is being railroaded by libs?
google staffers discussed manipulating the results
because they are biased
thats all you need to know
anything else is pure spin
Jezcoe:There doesn’t have to be any proof… just the feeling.
So you agree that Kavanaugh is being railroaded by libs?
I think that Ford is credible.
The allegations can never be proven and Kavenaugh will be confirmed as judge.
I think that it will ultimately backfire on the GOP to seem like they are moving this through as fast as they can.