Less than enough to change the outcome.
I noticed that too.
Sure there is. It’s free speech at work.
It violates every principle of liberalism.
Not an answer. That’s a dodge. My question was very specific.
How much fraud was there?
i blame everything on Sean Spicer going on dancing with the stars.
2 Likes
It is Critical Theory at work.
Unknown but not enough to effect the outcome.
Why can’t you accept that answer?
We had an election fraud commission set up in 2017.
Didn’t even issue a report before it disbanded.
A similar commission set up this time would yield the same results.
Allan
That’s an odd statement.
If its unknown, how can it be known that it wasn’t enough?
Perhaps, but it fits in nicely with capitalism and the first amendment.
The former AG told me so.
Allan
What are you saying Allan?
A lot of fraud
You friends with Eric “hot guns” Holder?
I believe the former AG in this case.
I believe the SOS from Georgia.
Allan
And that’s a problem. There was not enough fraud to change the results, but we won’t tell you how much there was? That’s a little sketchy. Can you now understand why millions of people want to run a ten day audit?
Rationalization of persecution? Tsk, tsk.
3 Likes
We will never know. The One Horse Pony Show starts on January 20th.
Fake news fake narrative
