Actually, it’s not. It is the stifling of speech of those deemed unworthy.
3 Likes
You see if Fox news refuses to say anything about the evidence of inciting insurrection or attempting to manipulate the courts to overturn an election, it’s cool though.
Less than 2016.
It only millions from the losing side. How many court cases were filed. How many recounts and signature audits. Why do we need yet another audit to verify that trump lost.
Hell trump didn’t give up after all the recounts and audits in Georgia.
What assurance does anyone have that they will Accept the results of this audit.
He will continue to beat the election fraud drum until his dying breath.
Allan
Of course he will. He loses protection from prosecution as soon as he leaves office.
No, actually it doesn’t. Capitalism does not seek to stifle competition. The 1st Amendment does not apply.
1 Like
Typical cancel culture progressive socialism. China would just make them disappear
Kind of like Joe turning an eye on hunter. 
I gotta admit the Hillary fraud machine was in overdrive in 2015 and 2016. You are correct about the Clinton syndicate.
Fake news? It’s an editorial.
A fake editorial too. Now all the bases are covered. Thanks, Bro.
How is it a fake editorial?
And global perception isn’t going to look kindly on us if we allow this behavior.
1 Like
You the one who insinuated that right? I am just agreeing with your including editorial with the other fakes. It is like buying a fake rolex on China.
Is it?
Does it now?
Everyone is laughing at how the cancel culture is wrapped around the axicel. Some countries think the One Horse Pony Show will be a big joke.
1 Like
Probably not, but I don’t care about them.
True.
1 Like
Cancel culture (Critical Theory) is in every Core country in the world. Australia is really bad.
