what plausible reason did Hillary have to use a private email server.
what plausible explanation is there for you not to know who hosted the clouds. What other entities were forced to move their email service as 140 cloud servers were shut down. Why has nobody said anything about this till now. As i am familiar with forensic services on computers and imaging the current narrative is plausible. what is not plausible is that it is just now becoming a narrative if it is true.
Private and dedicated cloud servers are hosted on machines across an organization/enterprise. The DNC hosts their own cloud. Unless youâre trying to say the DNC used a public cloud server which is insane.
It likely doesnât matter, but when the DNC says things like this, itâs hard for me to believe they used a public cloud.
The DNCâs network consisted of many servers and computers which either had be put out to pasture, rebooted, or rebuilt to rid them of malware and intruders. As the DNC explained in a 2018 lawsuit filed against the Russian government, it had to âdecommission more than 140 servers, remove and reinstall all software, including the operating systems, for more than 180 computers, and rebuild at least 11 serversâ as a result of the hacking.
The small social service agency I work for is going to switch from an on site server to a cloud server this spring. I donât know what a cloud network even isâŚbut I do know that cloud servers are awesomeâŚun limited space, vs a machine server. Faster speeds and etc.
a cloud system is just outsourced servers. commonly known as data centers. it is where you rent space. there is still a phsyical server. data is still kept on a hard drive.
This is why I rarely engage in conversation, debate or whatever. There was about ten or 12 posts if not more debunking the whole issue about cloud servers and how they workâŚi come back to read them all, and they disappear as I am reading them. Anyone have an idea why? Hard to debate/ converse when things keep disappearing.