Supreme Court Nominee

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Biden said this?

Yes. As a campaign promise. You know that.

That was the outcome. Do we know that he didn’t consider a larger pool prior to that announcement?

[WuWei]

A campaign promise is not an outcome.

The nomination is the outcome

[zantax]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

I know they grade candidates. It’s not a secret.

Sure. But you can’t show any of the grades. You can’t even know if they grade candidates outside their list of preferred candidates. You also miss that they are grading them for adherence to their politics, which is fine, but quite different than grading just on qualifications.

It’s clear they are a 100% partisan group. Now, you can claim the ABA is partisan but not like the Federalist Society. The ABA has given very good ratings to many, many conservative nominees. Has the Federalist Society done anything like that for liberal nominees?

No, your attempt at equivalence is summarily dismissed.

The Federalist Society fills the need to find judges that match their political views. That’s fine, but not in any way similar yo what the ABA is doing.

Ample evidence of ABA political bias.

Yes, the ABA Is Still a Left-Wing Advocacy Group | National Review

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Do we know that he didn’t consider a larger pool prior to that announcement?

Yes. It was a deal he made with Clyburn and the Woke to pander for their votes. And you know that too.

[PurpnGold]

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

@Striker840

It IS a difference, once again, the majority of us have ZERO issue a black woman was chosen. What @you continuously fail to acknowledge is the FACT that Biden ANNOUNCED the FACT that he was limiting his search on a replacement by 2 criteria, a specific race and gender. He could have simply picked her and it would have been the typical partisan bickering and the majority honestly wouldn’t care he picked a black woman. I know that is hard to comprehend, but it is accurate.

Yes, just like Trump announcing that he would be nominating a woman. But nobody complained about an affirmative action pick then.

That was after he already looked at possible candidates and had narrowed the list, ie, had already decided who it was going to be. He didn’t limit his search to just women.

That’s what he announced. I will grant that it was possible that he considered a larger pool… but he didn’t announce that.

Just like Biden didn’t announce that. He just stated his final pool would be qualified black women.

[WuWei]

The ABA does the exact same thing. I will grant the transparency of the guild.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

That’s what he announced. I will grant that it was possible that he considered a larger pool… but he didn’t announce that.

Was “woman” his first pick of the 3?

[Striker840]

@PurpnGold

@Striker840

Biden looked at only one subset of jurists to make his pick.

Biden said this?

You just see the outcome (announcement) and then assumed he didn’t look at any other candidates. He simply announced the final pool of candidates would be a black woman.

Did he or did he NOT say he would ONLY appoint a black woman to the seat??

As I said earlier, go pester someone else with your race baiting posts.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Just like Biden didn’t announce that. He just stated his final pool would be qualified black women.

He promised to. Before he had a pick to pick.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Do we know that he didn’t consider a larger pool prior to that announcement?

Yes. It was a deal he made with Clyburn and the Woke to pander for their votes. And you know that too.

Even if this were true. That was a narrowing of the pool. Presumably if that deal happened, Biden had a larger pool for consideration. Right?

Unless you are saying that Biden went to Clyburn already poised to select a black woman? If that is the case, whatever deal he had with Clyburn was irrelevant.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Just like Biden didn’t announce that. He just stated his final pool would be qualified black women.

He promised to. Before he had a pick to pick.

He promised? I haven’t heard that yet. Do you have a quote?

[zantax]

@Borgia_dude

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

Yes, just like Trump announcing that he would be nominating a woman. But nobody complained about an affirmative action pick then.

That was after he already looked at possible candidates and had narrowed the list, ie, had already decided who it was going to be. He didn’t limit his search to just women.

Are you adding narration or do you have something to back this up?

The list was public.

from Trump promises to nominate a woman to fill Supreme Court vacancy | Fox News

The President has placed two well-qualified justices on the court so far and he is about to select a third. Americans can see the names on his list of potential nominees

It had both men and women on it.

[PurpnGold]

@Striker840

Did he or did he NOT say he would ONLY appoint a black woman to the seat??

I don’t recall him saying “only” but I can be convinced if you have a quote.

[PurpnGold]

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

Yes, just like Trump announcing that he would be nominating a woman. But nobody complained about an affirmative action pick then.

That was after he already looked at possible candidates and had narrowed the list, ie, had already decided who it was going to be. He didn’t limit his search to just women.

Are you adding narration or do you have something to back this up?

The list was public.

from Trump promises to nominate a woman to fill Supreme Court vacancy | Fox News

The President has placed two well-qualified justices on the court so far and he is about to select a third. Americans can see the names on his list of potential nominees

It had both men and women on it.

Oh thank you…

Do Trump promised to put a woman on the court. Doesn’t that make his list irrelevant?

[WuWei]

It is true and you know it.

As for the rest of it… what? They all have a bigger pool to choose from before they promise to pick from a puddle to get elected. Which Brandon did.

It’s OK for you to admit he pandered and you© sold out - race over country.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Oh thank you…

Do Trump promised to put a woman on the court. Doesn’t that make his list irrelevant?

Which pick of the 3? Before or after the election?

[PurpnGold]

@PurpnGold

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

@zantax

@Borgia_dude

Yes, just like Trump announcing that he would be nominating a woman. But nobody complained about an affirmative action pick then.

That was after he already looked at possible candidates and had narrowed the list, ie, had already decided who it was going to be. He didn’t limit his search to just women.

Are you adding narration or do you have something to back this up?

The list was public.

from Trump promises to nominate a woman to fill Supreme Court vacancy | Fox News

The President has placed two well-qualified justices on the court so far and he is about to select a third. Americans can see the names on his list of potential nominees

It had both men and women on it.

Oh thank you…

Do Trump promised to put a woman on the court. Doesn’t that make his list irrelevant?

Wait the list that article is referring to is a list of women

Thank you for this

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@Striker840

Did he or did he NOT say he would ONLY appoint a black woman to the seat??

I don’t recall him saying “only” but I can be convinced if you have a quote.

“YOU PROMISED!”

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Oh thank you…

Do Trump promised to put a woman on the court. Doesn’t that make his list irrelevant?

Which pick of the 3? Before or after the election?

Read the article. He sent a letter promising a woman before the election.

That obvious since RBG died a few months before the election

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@Striker840

Did he or did he NOT say he would ONLY appoint a black woman to the seat??

I don’t recall him saying “only” but I can be convinced if you have a quote.

“YOU PROMISED!”

Looks like the only one who promised… was ya boi