Per capita?
When one does not hear about something, it’s not oversight. Oversight is when you are told, but don’t pay attention.
But keeping in line with your reply, what characterizes it as “huge” as opposed to being a regular sized oversight?

When we were taking thousands, we were turning away thousands. Won’t be anything new.
We’re still dealing with th overbearing backlog of those thousands. 50 will have little impact on that, the thousands your untenable idea will end up with will.

Are you believing that in the entire country of SA, only 50 wanted refugee status and free plane tickets to the US?
If that number ever increases to thousands, we can reassess.

I know it’s impossible for most here to say anything critical of trump, but how can you not see how sketchy it is to block all refugees that are brown and black - who used to have to pay for their plane rides - and give free rides to 50 whites?
And back to the ugly crux we go…white people.

We’re still dealing with th overbearing backlog of those thousands. 50 will have little impact on that, the thousands your untenable idea will end up with will.
I think you are conflating asylum seekers with the refugee program.

And back to the ugly crux we go…white people.
Shrug. He stopped allowing brown and black refugees in. Said all refugee entrances where on hold. EXCEPT these white guys.
He also is planning to send the brown folks who helped us fight the taliban home.
That you won’t admit that’s a bad look, well, not surprising, but disappointing.

e7alr:
It isn’t the rate, it is who is being targeted, and who is doing the targeting, and their motive for targeting…
Ok. What about all the other countries experiencing persecution? Why aren’t we open to them?
This is notable only because it is the exception tot he current rule.
Why do you want those SA farmers to die?

But keeping in line with your reply, what characterizes it as “huge” as opposed to being a regular sized oversight?
canceling the refugee program was huge.
Allan

Tguns:
Because it’s 50 of them (perhaps a few hundred), not tens of thousands.
We don’t have to take 10s of thousands from Sudan. We could take 50.
We have taken tens of thousands from Sudan in the past. How many white Boer farmers have we taken? Was the difference a problem then?

And back to the ugly crux we go…white people.
Yep, it’s that important for some reason.

Per capita?
Don’t forget the multiplier.

Samm:
tnt:
That’s why these 39 white afrikaners are news worthy.
All the people of color, from all the oppressive parts of the world can’t get in. These white folks can.
Because… because Musk is from SA? or…???
Could be. Is that a bad thing?
Let them in, sure.
It’s notable only because we have shut down all refugee immigration. And a vast majority of refugees are brown and black.
Then, we let in some white people.
When there are plenty of other countries experiencing equal or worse persecution and death. But they are brown and black people being oppressed.
Do you want to rescue millions of downtrodden people and care for them? These farmers amount to about 1/4 of an airliner passenger manifest and can fend for themselves when they get here. Are you going to feed and house thousands of refugees from Gaza or any other country experiencing strife at your house?
This is not a racial issue, it’s about practically. Calling this out because these people are white is racist.

Yep, it’s that important for some reason.
Millions of non-whites, we can’t turn them away.
50 whites, the rage machine runs in overdrive.
We all know why this is.

SixFoot:
Yep, it’s that important for some reason.
Millions of non-whites, we can’t turn them away.
50 whites, the rage machine runs in overdrive.
We all know why this is.
They’re very upfront with their automatic disdain for any and all white people, but they’re not very honest about that why part.

They’re very upfront with their automatic disdain for any and all white people, but they’re not very honest about that why part.
Because the why part is what their ideology is founded on. If it were spoken out loud and met with scrutiny the whole house comes crashing down.

7426k:
The “who is allowed” is South African Afrikaners. We’re welcoming them with an abbreviated path to citizenship and paying their airfare.
Even the antisemites!
Did Biden ask each of the migrants that he allowed to illegally cross the border during his term how they felt about Jews?

Why do you want those SA farmers to die?
I don’t.
Why do you want the people in Sudan to die?

SixFoot:
They’re very upfront with their automatic disdain for any and all white people, but they’re not very honest about that why part.
Because the why part is what their ideology is founded on. If it were spoken allowed and met with scrutiny the whole house comes crashing down.
Then perhaps their overtly racist outburst over this will help bring that dialogue up a notch or two.

Liberty323:
True, they hate him, but I think leftists just hate all whites period.
When it comes to leftists, I don’t think they hate all whites. Their entire ideology is premise on conflict and struggle. So there must always be a victim and a villain in every situation. White people just make for a convenient villian.
I agree. It’s more in line with what Obama said about the divide … they can get on the bus, but they are going to have to sit in the back, take blame for anything we (Libs) accuse them of and be quiet about it. But we (again Libs) don’t hate them.

tnt:
Tguns:
tnt:
I think it’s, why aren’t we taking in others who are in as bad, or worse, oppressive situations?
Because we’re not talking about thousands upon thousands of white south Africans…we’re talking 50, and if it continues over a few years…maybe hundreds.
You want to limit non-white south african asylum seekers to 50 every few months…cool with me. You just need to come up with a plan to tell the tens of thousands we turn away to go ■■■■ off, you didn’t make the cut.
So let’s take 50 or 100 from the Sudan or Gaza…
We both know that will never happen… come on
Maybe it won’t, but you know no such thing.
There are tens of thousands of Sudanese and Palestinians living in this country right now.

Tguns:
Because it’s 50 of them (perhaps a few hundred), not tens of thousands.
We don’t have to take 10s of thousands from Sudan. We could take 50.
We’ll put you in charge of selecting the lucky 50. Okay?

WuWei:
tnt:
It’s trump’s doing, not congresses.
Why do you think he stopped all refugees except these?
Incompatible cultures.
But antisemite apartheid refugees are compatible with us?
Are you referring to the guy who voiced strong support for Israel?