Why not?

TheRedComet:
“They’re all too privileged. They’re white, they can’t be oppressed. They can only oppress!”
I don’t think the argument is ‘don’t let white oppressed people in’.
I think it’s ‘why are we only letting white oppressed people in’?
What is the ratio and the result for the past two generations?
Why?
…

e7alr:
We know who is being targeted, and why, the murky part is the extent of the ANCs level of involvement in it.
No we don’t. More black farmer workers have been killed than white farmers.
South Africa is a violent country with the highest murder rate in the world.
You are assuming
Bigger pool.

Tguns:
So there must always be a victim and a villain in every situation. White people just make for a convenient villian.
You just described politics in 2025. Among conservatives… white people are the oppressed ones. For jobs, college, freedom of speech. The villains are black people, brown people, libs, trans, etc.
Right.

Tguns:
tnt:
So let’s take 50 or 100 from the Sudan or Gaza…
Go ahead, call your representative and get them to propose that. Get them to stand of the floor of the house or senate and say “I propose we allow up to 50 Sudanese or 50 Gazans to claim asylum every 3 months or so” and watch what happens.
It’s trump’s doing, not congresses.
Why do you think he stopped all refugees except these?
Incompatible cultures.

Tguns:
Because it’s 50 of them (perhaps a few hundred), not tens of thousands.
We don’t have to take 10s of thousands from Sudan. We could take 50.
Which 50?

FreeAndClear:
e7alr:
We know who is being targeted, and why, the murky part is the extent of the ANCs level of involvement in it.
No we don’t. More black farmer workers have been killed than white farmers.
South Africa is a violent country with the highest murder rate in the world.
You are assuming
Bigger pool.
If it was systemic and targeted it would not be consistent with demographics.
What?

tnt:
It’s trump’s doing, not congresses.
Why do you think he stopped all refugees except these?
Incompatible cultures.
But antisemite apartheid refugees are compatible with us?

We don’t have to take 10s of thousands from Sudan. We could take 50.
You know damn well that is untenable. We take 50 and the griping becomes why are we turning away thousands.

What?
Read it slow, you’ll get it.
You can do it. I believe in you.

WuWei:
tnt:
It’s trump’s doing, not congresses.
Why do you think he stopped all refugees except these?
Incompatible cultures.
But antisemite apartheid refugees are compatible with us?
Yes. Half the country.
I don’t speak 'tard.

tnt:
We don’t have to take 10s of thousands from Sudan. We could take 50.
You know damn well that is untenable. We take 50 and the griping becomes why are we turning away thousands.
When we were taking thousands, we were turning away thousands. Won’t be anything new.
Are you believing that in the entire country of SA, only 50 wanted refugee status and free plane tickets to the US?
I know it’s impossible for most here to say anything critical of trump, but how can you not see how sketchy it is to block all refugees that are brown and black - who used to have to pay for their plane rides - and give free rides to 50 whites?

I don’t speak 'tard.
That wasn’t 'tard.
This is 'tard:
If the blacks were trying to kill the whites, the ratio of murdered blacks to whites wouldn’t match the demographic makeup of the country.

7426k:
The “who is allowed” is South African Afrikaners. We’re welcoming them with an abbreviated path to citizenship and paying their airfare.
Even the antisemites!
Which specific antisemites? Exactly what did they say

Which specific antisemites? Exactly what did they say
Charl Kleinhaus posted on X in 2023 that “Jews are untrustworthy and a dangerous group.” In another post last fall, he shared a rightwing, nationalist YouTube video that was later removed, titled: “‘We’ll shoot ILLEGAL Immigrants!’ – Poland’s Illegal Islamic immigrant solution,” with clapping emojis.

WuWei:
I don’t speak 'tard.
That wasn’t 'tard.
This is 'tard:
If the blacks were trying to kill the whites, the ratio of murdered blacks to whites wouldn’t match the demographic makeup of the country.
Mostly not true. People tend to kill people like them who live around them. What is the ratio of whites killed by blacks compared to blacks killed by whites? IOW…if the ratio of whites killed is equal to that of blacks but only because race based killings of whites bring up that ratio, would that not be a problem?
Ok. We may have a Charl Kleinhaus problem then.
Are other refugees vetted like that for their views?